Thanks Thanks:  75
Likes Likes:  485
Page 7 of 108 FirstFirst 123456789101112131415161757107 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 1617
  1. #91
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,503
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    If GC are interested in Wallis, I'd expect them to do a trade rather than FA. If they bring Wallis in through FA, that might reduce their return on Lynch (assuming they don't match).

  2. #92
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by divvydan View Post
    If GC are interested in Wallis, I'd expect them to do a trade rather than FA. If they bring Wallis in through FA, that might reduce their return on Lynch (assuming they don't match).
    You're right. They will get better compo for Lynch than we will for Wallis but the AFL views a FA as a FA. It's in their interest to trade for Wallis.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hillside. (carn the sharks)
    Posts
    3,968
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Isn't May a FA also? If so they would lose 2 players to FA so if Wallis walks to GC it would cancel out only 1 FA compo... I think.

    Edit: just checked May isn't a FA so disregard any twaddle that I just wrote.
    They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
    Brian Fantana.

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,503
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    May is contracted until the end of next year at which point he would be a FA.

    Just for clarification, if GC brought Wallis in on FA and Lynch left on FA, it wouldn't remove all compensation for Lynch leaving but it would likely reduce the compensation from a first round pick to perhaps a mid first round pick or even an end of first round pick. How reduced the compensation would be would depend on the difference between their respective salaries and length of contract.

  5. #95
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,056
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by divvydan View Post
    May is contracted until the end of next year at which point he would be a FA.

    Just for clarification, if GC brought Wallis in on FA and Lynch left on FA, it wouldn't remove all compensation for Lynch leaving but it would likely reduce the compensation from a first round pick to perhaps a mid first round pick or even an end of first round pick. How reduced the compensation would be would depend on the difference between their respective salaries and length of contract.
    So we could potentially move up one spot inside the top 5 if we let Wallis walk?

    Sounds like some 4D chess.
    - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    4,609
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    On May and his FA status at the end of 2019; there's been discussion that the last thing GC want is their Lynch situation to be repeated with May this time next year so they might seek a commitment from him now to allay those fears.

    If he can't give them one, well...
    BORDERLINE FLYING

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by divvydan View Post
    May is contracted until the end of next year at which point he would be a FA.

    Just for clarification, if GC brought Wallis in on FA and Lynch left on FA, it wouldn't remove all compensation for Lynch leaving but it would likely reduce the compensation from a first round pick to perhaps a mid first round pick or even an end of first round pick. How reduced the compensation would be would depend on the difference between their respective salaries and length of contract.
    I've reiterated this a few times on here - it's age and dollars that are important for free agency compensation, contract length is of very minor importance.

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,786
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Axe Man View Post
    I've reiterated this a few times on here - it's age and dollars that are important for free agency compensation, contract length is of very minor importance.
    Yep read a while back it's the first two years of the contract are taken into consideration, the rest are only used if the decision is line-ball.
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  9. #99
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,470
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog4life View Post
    I have asked Bullies where he read this rumour and he didn't reply so I assume he din't read it or heard it anywhere except on WOOF. Are you just repeating what you read on WOOF BT?
    No wasn't in the paper. All I said was if a deal can be done to go home he will otherwise he will see out the contract.

  10. #100
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,264
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Anyone interested in Dayne Beams, and what would it take?
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  11. #101
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Eastern Suburbs
    Posts
    3,089
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Anyone interested in Dayne Beams, and what would it take?
    Yes. Great user of the ball, smart footballer and an identified leader. Unfortunately he will be 29 by start of next year so how much it would cost would be a factor.

    He's of similar age to Bryce Gibbs who Adelaide gave up picks 10 and 16 for last season. Beams would sit in a similar category.

    Adelaide gaining Gibbs probably fits their window more than it does our own but if we could manufacture it for a low second round pick (unlikely and which we don't currently have) then I'd be interested.

  12. #102
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    9,162
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Anyone interested in Dayne Beams, and what would it take?
    No, but I really rate him.
    "It's over. It's all over."

  13. #103
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    5,293
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    The most games he's played for the lions was in 2017.
    Has trouble staying on the park. With the age factor I'm a no.
    Also he has something that's a bit black and white about him that doesn't sit well.
    Don't piss off old people
    The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...

  14. #104
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,264
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    St Kilda has an eye on Dan Menzel and looking at a possible two-year offer
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  15. #105
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,470
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2018 AFL -Trade Rumours and Discussion

    WC have offered Roughy a contract which apparently is very generous and we won't match. Probably a good move for Roughy.

  16. Thanks azabob, bulldogtragic thanked for this post
    Likes Dry Rot, Mofra liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •