Thanks Thanks:  67
Likes Likes:  321
Page 26 of 53 FirstFirst ... 161718192021222324252627282930313233343536 ... LastLast
Results 376 to 390 of 789

Thread: The Chad Thread

  1. #376
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,571
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Can we get involved if Wingard chooses Hawks? Maybe a player......plus 15 for our 7? Who would we want?

  2. #377
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    866
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    I am beginning to think that perhaps the delay in Wingard coming out and saying anything publicly has been to do with seeing where Shiel fell. This would have ramifications for what demands the Hawks could meet and could go some way to explaining a delay in coming out and talking publicly.

    I am not ruling us out yet but did discover this evening that in the same way Chad (or his management) has been liking a large amount of posts on the Western Bulldogs instagram page, so to has he on the Hawks...

  3. #378
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,562
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by wimberga View Post
    I am beginning to think that perhaps the delay in Wingard coming out and saying anything publicly has been to do with seeing where Shiel fell. This would have ramifications for what demands the Hawks could meet and could go some way to explaining a delay in coming out and talking publicly.

    I am not ruling us out yet but did discover this evening that in the same way Chad (or his management) has been liking a large amount of posts on the Western Bulldogs instagram page, so to has he on the Hawks...
    Yeah, I saw that about an hour ago liking all the Tom Mitchell stuff. Seems a bit of trolling, or he really likes Mitchell and Redpath etc. I've assumed that his manager playing funny buggers all along, I hope it's his manager and not him.

    I think we are in a firm position with pick 7. In no way would I trade it to Hawthorn Fredi. I'd leave it as an open offer to Port for Wingard. If it doesn't happen, I don't mind going the draft. But we might just turn it our way. No way I'm helping Hawthorn by gifting them a great pick to ensure we don't get Wingard and we don't get pick 7. (& if Rhylee went 14 or higher, we’d lose pick 15 too)
    Last edited by bulldogtragic; 09-10-2018 at 11:52 PM.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  4. #379
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,478
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    People need to relax, no rush at all

  5. #380
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,397
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Would be a bitter pill to swallow if he nominated Hawthorn from here.

    Still think we should be ahead based on the groundwork done and the fact that if he wants to leave Port, we’re his best chance.

  6. #381
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Bendigo
    Posts
    9,483
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by The Bulldogs Bite View Post
    Would be a bitter pill to swallow if he nominated Hawthorn from here.

    Still think we should be ahead based on the groundwork done and the fact that if he wants to leave Port, we’re his best chance.
    I think we're gone now that Hawhthorn missed Shiels, they will take that offer straight to Chad. Smalls clubs are continually missing out on FAs. Norf, Saints missing player after player yet have the most to spend. Geelong, Hawks, Bombers etc continue to land them.

  7. #382
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,814
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    If we miss out we just go to draft with pick 7 and bank our cash till next year. No big deal.

  8. Likes Topdog, Go_Dogs liked this post
  9. #383
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    1,891
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    It’s very true that this free agency thing clearly benefits the bigger clubs. However, ask yourself who it’s REALLY benefited?
    From what I can see, Sydney, Geelong and Hawthorn are only messing with nature and causing themselves to slowly fizzle into mid table obscurity.

    Look at last year’s big trades or free agents: Jake Lever, Charlie Cameron, Bryce Gibbs & Lachie Weller. Which of those four would you take over Aaron Naughton or Ed Richards?

    Personally, I prefer my apples straight off the tree. They’re cheaper, younger and come with less baggage. Top up with some lower profile trades and free agents and move forward.

    Although Richmond are the envy of everyone, like the Swans with Buddy, they’re messing with a winning formula and taking on one hell of a salary cap burden at a time when they’ve got plenty of premiership players on their list. Then there’s the hubris factor.

    I’d personally prefer to keep building through the Draft.
    Last edited by Webby; 10-10-2018 at 09:15 AM.

  10. Thanks GVGjr thanked for this post
    Likes Topdog, Smads57, Go_Dogs liked this post
  11. #384
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,835
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Pick 7 is good or Wingard is good. I'm of the mind that we currently are floundering in mid table obscurity. Geelong / Hawthorn et al do not have sufficient talent across their entire list to be genuine top 4 but we do in the foreseeable future. Our bottom 6 are pretty good players now and a Wingard type might just be the difference between the middle of the ladder and finals. We might not be a top 4 team with Wingard but getting him will go a long way to exposing our kids to finals and reinvigorating our generally demoralised member base.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  12. #385
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,562
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Trade radio:

    Kane Cornes: I reckon the Power are fed up about this issue with Chad. They don't want to be asked any more questions about him. They (Wingard camp) have to make a call in the next 24 hours because the Power have had enough of this.

    #NABTradeRadio
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

  13. #386
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,835
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogtragic View Post
    Trade radio:

    Kane Cornes: I reckon the Power are fed up about this issue with Chad. They don't want to be asked any more questions about him. They (Wingard camp) have to make a call in the next 24 hours because the Power have had enough of this.

    #NABTradeRadio
    It's fair enough really he just needs to release a statement now it's really dragging on and he needs to be advised that he's making it a bigger issue than it needs to be and creating more angst. If he wants a bidding war just come out and say it's between the Dogs, Hawks and Saints and let it begin.

    FWIW Gary Lyon this morning said it's Power or Dogs as did Cornes yesterday. Tom Browne adamant the Hawks have him now.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  14. #387
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    6,682
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Port now have pick 11 to play with.

    Wingard and 11 for 7 and Future 1st?

  15. #388
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,825
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by westdog54 View Post
    Port now have pick 11 to play with.

    Wingard and 11 for 7 and Future 1st?
    And they've clear a bit off their salary cap.

    Seems like a deal we might consider.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  16. #389
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    2,386
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by westdog54 View Post
    Port now have pick 11 to play with.

    Wingard and 11 for 7 and Future 1st?
    This was reported yesterday, but with their pick 10 instead of 11.

    I guess it comes down to a few factors:
    1) Where will we finish next year? Around the same mark= bad deal. Lower= bad deal. Eight or higher=probably great deal
    2) What is the draft class like next year versus this year? Who do we get at 10/11 this year and how will that compare to someone we get in the (probabaly) 8-10 range next year.
    3) Will we have enough points for our father/son selections? There are a few coming through, will we need a first rounder?

  17. #390
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,562
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: The Chad Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by westdog54 View Post
    Port now have pick 11 to play with.

    Wingard and 11 for 7 and Future 1st?
    That's really balanced for both teams. I like it.
    Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •