-
11-10-2018, 11:56 PM
#676
Re: The Chad Thread
You may all think Hawthorn is a destination club, but they missed on Lynch, Shiel and Gaff.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
12-10-2018, 12:05 AM
#677
Re: The Chad Thread
Hmm maybe but Gunston, Burgoyne, McEvoy, Mitchell, O'Meara , Impey, Wingard hard to argue they aren't doing something right.
-
12-10-2018, 12:09 AM
#678
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
Hmm maybe but Gunston, Burgoyne, McEvoy, Mitchell, O'Meara , Wingard hard to argue they aren't doing something right.
However, it gets to a point when you can't just keep topping up from other clubs. Hawks have 9 players in the 30 plus age group - this is a massive problem for the future.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
12-10-2018, 12:20 AM
#679
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
jeemak
I'm not sure that he qualifies as the traditional dickhead, does he?
If the scuttlebutt is true, perhaps Port just couldn't justify paying him top dollar when he wasn't prepared to go that extra mile. Perhaps we were willing to pay him and try and turn him around via a calculated risk.
Perhaps, but it still flies directly in the face of our painful list pruning process, post-flag.
We might've taken the position Wingard's on-field input was worth his off-field BS, but again, what's that say to blokes who've lost mates for not towing the line? And what if good intentions failed to reform our top dollar new recruit on a squad full of impressionable kids trying to craft a professional culture of success?
It don't add up. Again, assuming the Wingard chat isn't hot air.
BORDERLINE FLYING
-
12-10-2018, 12:27 AM
#680
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
Rocket Science
Perhaps, but it still flies directly in the face of our painful list pruning process, post-flag.
We might've taken the position Wingard's on-field input was worth his off-field BS, but again, what's that say to blokes who've lost mates for not towing the line? And what if good intentions failed to reform our top dollar new recruit on a squad full of impressionable kids trying to craft a professional culture of success?
It don't add up. Again, assuming the Wingard chat isn't hot air.
Is Wingard reputed to be a party boy and problem gambler?
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
12-10-2018, 12:29 AM
#681
Re: The Chad Thread
It was always definitely curious Port were getting rid of a club favourite, cult hero and more importantly a local boy. And by all reports Chad doesn’t want to leave. It does have a bit of Stringer stink to it.
-
12-10-2018, 12:29 AM
#682
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
jeemak
Is Wingard reputed to be a party boy and problem gambler?
Reading the article his issues are his laziness and effort he puts in,
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
12-10-2018, 12:40 AM
#683
Re: The Chad Thread
I can't believe Hawthorn offered up Burton. He is a quality young player. Shit they are desperate just to bring in a big name player.
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
12-10-2018, 12:44 AM
#684
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
ratsmac
I can't believe Hawthorn offered up Burton. He is a quality young player. Shit they are desperate just to bring in a big name player.
and he has a contract
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
12-10-2018, 12:49 AM
#685
Re: The Chad Thread
So, if Burton says no or for whatever other reason the Hawks and Port can’t get a deal up, could we still be in the mix?
Out of interest, who was the last player who nominated and then ended up at a different club? Has there been one?
-
12-10-2018, 12:52 AM
#686
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
bornadog
However, it gets to a point when you can't just keep topping up from other clubs. Hawks have 9 players in the 30 plus age group - this is a massive problem for the future.
That's true they need to hit the draft.
-
12-10-2018, 12:54 AM
#687
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
ratsmac
I can't believe Hawthorn offered up Burton. He is a quality young player. Shit they are desperate just to bring in a big name player.
Hawks fans aren't happy !
-
12-10-2018, 12:55 AM
#688
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
The Adelaide Connection
So, if Burton says no or for whatever other reason the Hawks and Port can’t get a deal up, could we still be in the mix?
Out of interest, who was the last player who nominated and then ended up at a different club? Has there been one?
Nick Stevens ?
Edit : Wanted to go to Collingwood but Port wasnt happy so ended up at Carlton.
-
12-10-2018, 01:03 AM
#689
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
jeemak
Is Wingard reputed to be a party boy and problem gambler?
I've no idea but the vibe seems to be a lax off-field regimen which speaks directly to professional standards.
Precisely what we're trying to correct, whatever the causes or symptoms.
Why would we then expose a young group to that? While paying the blow-in a fortune in the process?
Again, just confused.
BORDERLINE FLYING
-
12-10-2018, 01:11 AM
#690
Re: The Chad Thread
So what do we think about GC’s Jack Scrimshaw?
Looking to get back to Melbourne. Taken at pick 7 in 2016, he is a 193cm highly rated, rebounding defender. Apparently his agility, decision making and skills are exceptional and he will most likely be able to move into the midfield.
The kicker? Hawks are into him in a big way but apparently having a hard time finding any currency (made harder with the Wingard announcement). Let’s swoop in at the last second and get him. Seems a great prospect and it will piss them off AND it is likely the reason they are happy to part with Burton.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes