SO. These 4-players are all changing clubs (so it would seem). Who is the best?

4. Beams. He is the oldest (by far). To me, that is where the argument starts and stops!

3. Shiel. Of the 3x 25 year olds (Shiel, Neale and Wingard are all 25), he is the most limited. He has been playing in a VERY good midfield - and has never been close to the best player. To me he is more cream than cake and has relied heavily on the work of Ward and Coniglio inside and has not copped the tagging attention of Kelly and Whitfield outside. Hasn't won a B&F...

2. Neale. Multiple B&F winner. Plays his BEST footy when he is 'da man' (aka when Fyfe is out, he steps UP). Goal kicker - well, apparently Shiel kicks more even though that isn't true! and is just a possession winning machine.

1. Wingard. Enough about him. Mid/forward, goal-kicking match-winner...

SO....why are people saying multiple first round picks will get Shiel, 1 early pick will get Neale and 1 mid-range pick will get Wingard. Is anyone watching footy and challenging these assessments? Or do people just not watch Freo and Port games but have been forced to watch the Giants as they have gone deeper into the finals over the past couple of seasons? Somethings up here...