-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
lemmon
That's a fair call. I think he's playing small-pressure forward out of necessity and it hasn't really worked. Is Cavarra far off?
I think Cavarra would be a fair bit off the mark at the moment. Needs some continuity with his football
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
EasternWest
I'm always down with dropping Suckling.
I thought Suckling was very good today. Found the ball and defended very well.
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
I thought Suckling was very good today. Found the ball and defended very well.
I thought so too.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
Bumper Bulldogs
No way will Bevo make any changes this week. We will go on I changed with Smith going out the week after. Easy kill coming up and confidence building fir smith. They just need to set him up with a role and he’ll be ok.
3 love I say.
I don't think Gold Coast have shown themselves to be easy kills so far. Disrespect them and I believe they'll keep you honest
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
I thought Suckling was very good today. Found the ball and defended very well.
That's ok. I'm happy to disagree.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Wouldn't drop Smith or Young - both played well and have a lot more to give, which only playing at the top level will allow.
Bit worried about Richards' form but if we drop him for Lipinski we look a lot slower. Richards for Williams maybe.
No change otherwise.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
The Bulldogs Bite
Wouldn't drop Smith or Young - both played well and have a lot more to give, which only playing at the top level will allow.
Bit worried about Richards' form but if we drop him for Lipinski we look a lot slower. Richards for Williams maybe.
No change otherwise.
I wonder what the real reason was for Williams not playing today
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
EasternWest
That's ok. I'm happy to disagree.
Ah that's right sorry token whipping boy. Soz forgets...
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
Ah that's right sorry token whipping boy. Soz forgets...
I resent that. I have legitimate gripes with his disposal and decision making. I've never had a "token whipping boy" in my life.
I think he's totally a paycheque player that takes the easy option 100% of the time and for a guy with a deadly leg cannon he sure kicks a lot of crap.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Happy to disagree with you.
I thought he was important today. 25 kicks and tried his guts out.
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
EasternWest
I resent that. I have legitimate gripes with his disposal and decision making. I've never had a "token whipping boy" in my life.
I think he's totally a paycheque player that takes the easy option 100% of the time and for a guy with a deadly leg cannon he sure kicks a lot of crap.
2 clangers and 76% disposal efficiency from 29 disposals.
I thought he played a very good game today although his first half was better than the second half.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Think that Smith is building nicely and will benefit from as much senior games as possible so that he can adjust to the pace as quickly as possible.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
Originally Posted by
bornadog
2 clangers and 76% disposal efficiency from 29 disposals.
I thought he played a very good game today although his first half was better than the second half.
Obviously putting a ball 50m in the air to no real advantage doesn’t count as a Clanger because he must have done that 10+ times. He was ok overall but if someone was playing well enough to replace him, I’d be very happy.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Thread Round 3, Vs Gold Coast Suns
We are carrying Smith atm so I like the idea of swapping him for Lipinski. Smith was better today but I think that's good, shows him he is capable and now we let him play VFL for a couple of weeks to just really build confidence and get the ball knowing he will get another chance soon.
I'm not huge on Young but he was good enough to retain his spot, although should Williams be fit then I'd happily unswap them.
Richards need to stay. He is in and out of games atm but when he is involved good stuff happens. He is also a point of difference to our entire forward half and we have no obvious replacement for his role.
I should leave it alone but you're not right
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes