-
17-10-2022, 02:41 PM
#1306
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
Mofra
We've been linked with Rowe, not sure if we'd put him on the main list or rookie list.
Do we have to elevate Sweet and/or Khamis this year? May be 3 live picks and 1 elevation for us this draft.
Parker is out and he was a rookie
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
17-10-2022, 04:12 PM
#1307
Re: Player Contract Status
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
17-10-2022, 04:13 PM
#1308
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
azabob
Stef Martin has retired.
Everything is coming up Millhouse.
I'm liking this cleanout.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
17-10-2022, 04:18 PM
#1309
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
azabob
Stef Martin has retired.
Shame we didn't get him a couple of years earlier. He had a very good career.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
17-10-2022, 04:20 PM
#1310
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
Everything is coming up Millhouse.
I'm liking this cleanout.
Great decisions by the club. In Wally’s case a tough call. But this is really good list management.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
17-10-2022, 05:05 PM
#1311
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Great decisions by the club. In Wally’s case a tough call. But this is really good list management.
Agree BT. I like the way we didn't rush into the decisions but took our time about them.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
17-10-2022, 10:00 PM
#1312
Re: Player Contract Status
ok, what is the score now with list spots available to fill as at this present juncture?
Officially on the Bus-wagon
-
17-10-2022, 10:01 PM
#1313
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
F'scary
ok, what is the score now with list spots available to fill as at this present juncture?
5 Main List
1 Rookie List
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
17-10-2022, 10:19 PM
#1314
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
5 Main List
1 Rookie List
So, first 3 picks in the draft are a given. Question is do we use pick 69 &/or 87 or do we go 1 or 2 DFAs. Or other strategy?
I guess it depends on where you can spot the potential.
Officially on the Bus-wagon
-
17-10-2022, 10:26 PM
#1315
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
F'scary
So, first 3 picks in the draft are a given. Question is do we use pick 69 &/or 87 or do we go 1 or 2 DFAs. Or other strategy?
I guess it depends on where you can spot the potential.
I’ve previously posted. For me, one DFA. Four spots to the draft. The fourth comes from:
Trading Brisbane’s Future First for say GWS pick 15 (like drafting Pickett at 12 & Weightman at 15) if the club really rates the kid available at 15
Trading other future picks to get in this year
Looking at a roughy at Pick 69
Upgrading a rookie if so deserving
Leaving it open for a SSP selection for players training with us over summer
Lots of options taking in four spots.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
18-10-2022, 10:19 AM
#1316
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
5 Main List
1 Rookie List
We were running with a full 6 category A rookies. You can have just the 4 category A rookies and have 2 more on the primary list.
So although you would think we will stick with the current structure and go +5 to the main list and +1 to the rookies, we could also:
+6 main list, or
+7 main list and -1 rookie list (through a rookie elevation).
Another possibility involves shifting a category B rookie to category A (Khamis, Raak), reducing the overall list size, although I'm not sure why we would do that.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
18-10-2022, 10:54 AM
#1317
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
We were running with a full 6 category A rookies. You can have just the 4 category A rookies and have 2 more on the primary list.
So although you would think we will stick with the current structure and go +5 to the main list and +1 to the rookies, we could also:
+6 main list, or
+7 main list and -1 rookie list (through a rookie elevation).
Another possibility involves shifting a category B rookie to category A (Khamis, Raak), reducing the overall list size, although I'm not sure why we would do that.
True. There’s a very slight higher wages bill by moving the balance towards the main list too. I guess Power has right until the end of the ND to make a final decision. I guess if we live traded (for example) into four good picks, and at Pick 69 there’s someone the club really wants who won’t skip to Pick 11 in the rookie draft, Power has the flexibility to pull the trigger on that player at Pick 69 and forego the rookie draft pick. Power has left himself a lot of flexibility (from his delistings) as you say.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
18-10-2022, 11:56 AM
#1318
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
I’ve previously posted. For me, one DFA. Four spots to the draft. The fourth comes from:
Trading Brisbane’s Future First for say GWS pick 15 (like drafting Pickett at 12 & Weightman at 15) if the club really rates the kid available at 15
Trading other future picks to get in this year
Looking at a roughy at Pick 69
Upgrading a rookie if so deserving
Leaving it open for a SSP selection for players training with us over summer
Lots of options taking in four spots.
Pick 69 should move up substantially once FS & NGA bids are matched.
We do have future picks to help move those later picks up too
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
18-10-2022, 11:56 AM
#1319
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
I’ve previously posted. For me, one DFA. Four spots to the draft. The fourth comes from:
Trading Brisbane’s Future First for say GWS pick 15 (like drafting Pickett at 12 & Weightman at 15) if the club really rates the kid available at 15
Trading other future picks to get in this year
Looking at a roughy at Pick 69
Upgrading a rookie if so deserving
Leaving it open for a SSP selection for players training with us over summer
Lots of options taking in four spots.
very complicated business, these days. I have been reading your posts and they are very interesting. My 2 cents is that I have a natural aversion to trading future year picks for the current year. I get worried that comes the next draft, things have gone such that you really need to go to the draft and your highest pick isn't even worth draft points. 12 months can be a long time in football. I'm sure there are some clubs that have already done this to themselves. To me, it is kind of related to not managing your salary cap.
Officially on the Bus-wagon
-
18-10-2022, 11:57 AM
#1320
Re: Player Contract Status
Originally Posted by
Axe Man
We were running with a full 6 category A rookies. You can have just the 4 category A rookies and have 2 more on the primary list.
So although you would think we will stick with the current structure and go +5 to the main list and +1 to the rookies, we could also:
+6 main list, or
+7 main list and -1 rookie list (through a rookie elevation).
Another possibility involves shifting a category B rookie to category A (Khamis, Raak), reducing the overall list size, although I'm not sure why we would do that.
...just to simplify things...
Officially on the Bus-wagon