Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  9
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    flemington
    Posts
    2,886
    Post Thanks / Like

    How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    It’s a great problem to have, don’t get me wrong……. but I feel for our match committee.
    How the hell do you fit all the talent on our list into a starting 22.

    I’ve had a go at a starting 22 and the amount of talent lining up for a spot on the bench is ridiculous.

    I’ve thought through this long and hard. And been re-watching last year’s games. Some players name themselves and some just squeeze in over others. But even if you shuffled say… Duryea in for Suckling…. Suckling still ends up on the list jockeying for a spot on the bench.

    Anyway, here goes my attempt.

    Backline. Suckling. Trengove. Wood.

    Suckling edges out quite a few competitors with his experience, his creative play, that incredible kick, and his pace and lurking menace as a long range goal kicker.

    Trengove edges out Lewis Young for fullback due to strength and experience. I believe we erred in not naming him for the GWS final. We could have used him out there. But this position could flip to Lewis Young based on form. or opposition match ups. Trengove for the gorillas for example. Either way, it’s one of those two.

    Wood. If fit and in form Wood is still a great asset with his aerial skills, strength, experience and natural leadership. He still demands this spot in my opinion.


    Half back line. Crozier. Keith. Johannisen.
    (This one names itself really)

    Crozier absolutely owned this position last year. I had no idea how good he was going to be when we traded him in. Seriously one of the most underrated players in the league

    Keith & Johannisen just walk into these 2 positions don’t they? (apologies Bruce)

    Centreline. Hunter. Dunkley. Smith.
    (don’t think I need to explain these names)

    Half forward line. Dickson. Bruce. Schache.

    Dickson. Until proven otherwise is a walk up start for a spot in the forward line. If father time catches up with him that’s a different story. But for now. He’s in. Bailey Dale is next in line for this spot. You could flip it either way

    Bruce. No brainer. that’s what he’s here for.

    Schache. Well, I’m going along with the ‘3 talls’ narrative until it doesn’t work. Also……. I want to keep playing Schache for his own confidence and development. AND he is a reliable goal kicker and can be used in other roles…….. ruck, for example, if needed at a pinch

    Full forward line. Lloyd. Naughton. McLean.

    Lloyd is a walk up start. Naughton is a walk up start.

    Mclean. I threw a few names around but ended up going with Toby. He’s good overhead. Good on the lead. Good in the packs. A good tackler and has genuine X factor. Good field kick and good set shot. I also think he’s due for a bust out season. AND he can rotate through the guts. Plenty of other names could go in here but I’ve settled on Mclean.

    Followers.

    English. Bontempelli. Macrae. Duh……..no arguments here.

    Now……..who gets a spot on the bench out of these 15 legitimate contenders? All whom have shown the capacity to perform at the top level.

    Lewis Young. Mitch Wallis. Zaine Cordy. Taylor Duryea. Ed Richards. Tom Liberatore. Patrick Lipinski. Billy Gowers. Bailey Dale. Will Hayes. Bailey Williams. Caleb Daniel. Lachie Young. Lin Jong. Roarke Smith

    I’ll go with. Lipinski. Daniel. Liberatore. Cordy (Cordy for flexibility).

    This leaves out Bailey Dale, Taylor Duryea, Ed Richards, Mitch Wallis and Bailey Williams. 5 players I would love to put in. Maybe Dale comes in for Cordy?

    Then there’s the next wave fighting for a spot.

    Rhylee West. Cody Weightman. Brad Lynch. Fergus Greene.
    There is some speculation Weightman is already pushing for a spot. Rhylee West has already shown he’s capable at senior level…..as has Lynch. I love Lynch and I reckon he’d be getting a game at most AFL clubs. Greene looked promising and certainly not lost at the top level.

    It’s mind boggling. Even if you shuffle a few names around……. there’s so much talent spilling out over the sides it’s ridiculous.

    Of course injuries will come into it......... but good luck naming a starting 22

  2. Likes Torpedo, jeemak liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    18,719
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    It's tough, but a better problem to have than not having it at all.

    The real question is whichever the combination, do we actually have enough elite talent and can our players bring their game to the required level consistently enough to be relied upon to match it with the best in the competition?

    I honestly don't know the answer, a part of me thinks we should be good enough while another part of me is concerned that no matter the mix, we will still fall short. Will be really interesting to see how it plays out.
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,147
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post
    It’s a great problem to have, don’t get me wrong……. but I feel for our match committee.
    How the hell do you fit all the talent on our list into a starting 2
    Talent and proven AFL players are not the same thing.

    I actually have trouble PICKING 22.
    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    E.J. Whitten Stand
    Posts
    17,162
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    Talent and proven AFL players are not the same thing.

    I actually have trouble PICKING 22.
    Let's see it then!
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    flemington
    Posts
    2,886
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Are you serious? Everyone I've named is a proven AFL player. Maybe Schache doesn't quite get that tick........yet.

    But the bench is all proven AFL players.

    There are proven AFL players including a dual premiership player who aren't even getting a game.

    Mitch Wallis is another proven AFL player who has been left out.

    Are you just being ornery?

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    Talent and proven AFL players are not the same thing.

    I actually have trouble PICKING 22.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,680
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Suckling, Dickson, Wood... how many games do we expect these guys to play this year?
    Where is Daniel's best spot? Bailey Williams?

    Who takes the second wing spot?

    Can Schache play in the same side as Dale, given they both play as bruise-free flankers? Can Dickson and Lloyd play in the same side?

    For mine the problem isn't picking the best 22 players, it's filling the positional holes we have. We need a distributor off the HB line, and JJ runs the ball so that's Suckling or Caleb Daniel. Can we play both?
    How does our F50 pressure stack up against the competition's best?
    Who in our midfield is a bastard and is a lock for best 22?
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,147
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Maybe I am being ornery. But in terms of proven/unproven:

    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post

    Backline. Suckling. Trengove. Wood.
    I'll give you Suckling. Trengove is battling to get a game and Wood has had 50% of us questioning his place in the side over the past 2-3 seasons. Was Wood "PROVEN" once upon a time? Sure. He needs to prove it again if he wants to be a week-in, week-out player.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post
    Half back line. Crozier. Keith. Johannisen.
    Crozier is proven. JJ is 'kinda' proven - but as what exactly? Can he fight through a tag? Have we ever worked this out? Where is Bevo going to play him? Harsh call as he will be in the 22 and is an AFL player, but if we are playing the number of interceptors it looks like we will play, is he going to have to lock on to an opponent? And what happens if he does?

    Keith is 100% NOT PROVEN. Did it as a fill-in at another club that was battling...that doesn't prove anything. Massive ? mark for me on the role he plays and how he fits in. Ask me in R#22 if he is proven.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post
    Centreline. Hunter. Dunkley. Smith.
    Hunter and Dunkley are proven. Smith has had one season - and where does he play this year? As a winger? Well, unproven. As an inside mid? Well, he's done that...but I've heard of a little thing called the 2nd year blues and I'm not counting any chickens...young players often get worse before they get better.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post
    Half forward line. Dickson. Bruce. Schache.
    Dickson WAS proven...can he stay fit for a week? A month? A season? Goodness knows.
    Bruce is 'proven'...what isn't proven is if he can play alongside Naughton...he has been the 'man' at the Saints for 2 years now and in case you didn't notice, that hasn't worked out too great for them. Schache is NOT PROVEN...and particularly not proven as the '3rd tall' out of 3 and double particularly not proven playing high as a secondary target.


    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post
    Full forward line. Lloyd. Naughton. McLean.
    Lloyd is kind of proven...except when the Tiges won their flag, they were happy to play Townsend and Butler ahead of him. I think he's good but still has to prove that there is steak and not just sizzle for a season and not for a month.
    Naughton has played one season in his life as a key forward. NOT PROVEN.
    McLean? What position does he play again? Dropped last season...NOT PROVEN.
    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post
    Followers.
    English. Bontempelli. Macrae. Duh……..no arguments here.
    English is NOT PROVEN. The other two are amazing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post
    ...bench

    I’ll go with. Lipinski. Daniel. Liberatore. Cordy (Cordy for flexibility).
    I think you could almost say Lipinski was 'semi proven' after the past two years but will the coach even pick him? Liber is not proven these days...Cordy is 100% not proven particularly given his overall performances last year and the fact you have already selected Keith, Wood, Bruce, Trengove, English, Naughton, Schache...where would he even PLAY in this team? I would like to say Daniel is proven as I love watching him but I think we all know he was a liability at times last year (44% of 1-v-1 contests LOST which is world record pace) and I have no idea where he will play...elite ball user of course but is he the defensive rotator or a mid or WHAT exactly?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dancin' Douggy View Post
    This leaves out Bailey Dale, Taylor Duryea, Ed Richards, Mitch Wallis and Bailey Williams. 5 players I would love to put in. Maybe Dale comes in for Cordy?
    Dale - Unproven. And I am not sure can play if Schache, Naughton, Bruce, Lloyd and Dickson do.
    Duryea - 100% PROVEN.
    Richards - PROVEN.
    Wallis - too injured to be proven.
    Bailey Williams - UNPROVEN.

    So ornery or not, whilst I 100% agree we are talented I think the problem with picking 22 is that we don't actually KNOW about a lot of the players on the list...a lot of them are between 15-30 games and - as many are at that stages of their career - have been wildly inconsistent. I mean, did we win games late last year because Bailey Dale kicked bags of goals or did he kick bags of goals because the rest of the side was playing well? The truth is most likely somewhere in the middle but we seriously have NO IDEA.
    Last edited by mjp; 21-02-2020 at 02:08 PM. Reason: Messed up quote
    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

  9. Thanks hujsh, bornadog, ratsmac thanked for this post
    Likes soupman, Mofra, Dry Rot liked this post
  10. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,588
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Did you mean to say Richards is proven there mjp? If so why? Only one there I didn't quite follow the logic of.

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,147
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    Did you mean to say Richards is proven there mjp? If so why? Only one there I didn't quite follow the logic of.
    I think Richards IS proven and is under-rated by supporters.

    He has played 40 games as an outside runner in two years moving between wing and half back. He gets it about 15 times every week, has good balance between contested and uncontested, runs and carries, kicks it ok...I think he has been better at HB than wing and suffered a bit from the change but to me he is the man who will line up across from Hunter and has the best credentials to do so.

    I'm not sure why he isn't more of a favourite...I just know that we all seem to love everyone BUT Ed.
    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    West of somewhere.
    Posts
    6,147
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Oh - I guess I have Richards and Lipinski in the same boat. Good, consistent performers who seem to be undervalued by 'US' and to an extent by the MC...though to be fair Richards has hardly missed a game in two seasons.
    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

  13. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,680
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    Oh - I guess I have Richards and Lipinski in the same boat. Good, consistent performers who seem to be undervalued by 'US' and to an extent by the MC...though to be fair Richards has hardly missed a game in two seasons.
    Lipinski's VFL time last year was pretty well telegraphed to fans - he needed to work on his inside game which is the one aspect of his game that wasn't shown at AFL level.

    He did his time, developed his inside game, and wasn't dropped again.

    Richards has been thrown around like a dog toy. The knock on him is production but the question is - how many ball winners can we carry? Richards runs the ball and uses it well and all signs point to the MC rewarding players who try to make the play.
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  14. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,588
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    My issue with Richards last year was that for a man you can kick a beautiful ball he didn't do enough with the limited posession he had (missed goals and poor field kicking). Otherwise I like a lot of what he brings to the team but wouldn't have thought he was proven if Lipinski isn't.

    Perhaps grouping them together is fair

  15. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    60,856
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    The best way to solve the OP's question is we pick the inform players at the time of selection. There will always be players with niggles, injuries, issues etc . When we pick the best players, they should be the best suited for the role we need them to play.

    I know this is fence sitting and not naming them, but, I want to see who is ready for the start of the season.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  16. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    My god you could go through every list and see “unproven “ players

  17. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    60,856
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you solve a problem called ‘Our List’

    Quote Originally Posted by Remi Moses View Post
    My god you could go through every list and see “unproven “ players
    I don't think that is the point.

    It is not as hard to pick the best 22 as the OP may make out, as there is lots of potential/talent that we as Bulldog supporters tend to over rate when they haven't proven anything yet.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •