Thanks Thanks:  16
Likes Likes:  136
Page 20 of 31 FirstFirst ... 101112131415161718192021222324252627282930 ... LastLast
Results 286 to 300 of 465
  1. #286
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Hillside. (carn the sharks)
    Posts
    3,950
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Howmany *!*!*!*!ing missed or broken tackles?
    They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
    Brian Fantana.

  2. #287
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Our blokes should just stand and watch. Especially when it goes over their forward 50.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  3. #288
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,779
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Have we ever been first to the ball? It’s like we’re unfit

  4. #289
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,636
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Will we ever learn that Mitch Wallis isn’t an AFL standard mid?

  5. Likes Sedat liked this post
  6. #290
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,299
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Is it really 10 I50s? Surely that's impossible

  7. #291
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,761
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Maybe we have found the answer.

    Ignore the flanks, use the corridor. Roll the dice dogs
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  8. #292
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,454
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Quote Originally Posted by Mofra View Post
    Jesus, we're questioning English based on one shortened half against the best ruck in the competition?

    He's basically the age Morris was on debut, except he's 207cm.
    He’ll be a player, but he’s been embarrassed tonight, physically monstered.

    He’s just not ready for the no. 1 ruck role.
    Float Along - Fill Your Lungs

  9. #293
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,350
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    100% goal kicking accuracy. I guess that's at least something to consider as the house burns around us.

  10. #294
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    On the bright side we are nailing every chance at goal.
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  11. #295
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In renovator's dreams
    Posts
    6,277
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Who’ll hit a target when Suckling retires?

  12. #296
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,636
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Gardner is lucky to hit his foot when he kicks.. AFL player.. ok!

  13. Likes BornInDroopSt'54 liked this post
  14. #297
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,299
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Gardner lol.

  15. #298
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,993
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Stop scapegoating Garder guys.
    - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

  16. Likes Yankee Hotel Foxtrot liked this post
  17. #299
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    32,350
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    Naughton not fit. Why is he playing?

  18. #300
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,524
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020

    1. Cordy is not a full back. (And Nobody has told him the principles of kicking in.)

    2. Collingwood knows that they have a dominant height advantage in the forward zone. So you can see them kick to setup 25 metres from goal. They have not had a long shot at goal in 14 scores.

    3. Because of the height disadvantage it has been common to see the Dogs have 3 backmen attempting to spoil in a pack. This gives the Collingwood forwards the chance to spread.

    4. The Dogs have been static. Not one attacking foot pass to a runner in the clear. Still handball focused with a receiver too close.

    5. Kicks into the forward line are poor. High floaters after Collingwood has had time to fall back and set up.

    6. Ruck structure doesn’t allow flexibility, needs a sacrificial spoiler so English can remain a significant contributor.

    7. Dogs are standing too far from opposition. Allows them time to setup. They are getting no value from defending grass.

    8. At most stoppages Collingwood has players away from the ball and players are looking for them.

    9. Cox has dropped the ball a number of times and not been penalised.

    10. Grundy hits the body, then the ball. Our rucks are not taking the hit into their routine.

    11.

  19. Likes merantau, GVGjr, S Coast Simon liked this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •