Trade Dunkley

[WBFC4FFC]

If Treloar is too complex and there isn't another serious player to be had then Dunkley has to stay. Pick 8 even if it's turned into a first-round next year not interested. Be strong Sammy.

Great to see we have signed Jong once more. In the best 22 when fit and healthy. Pace, strong tackler who takes a great overhead mark.

I just wonder whether his signing now is due to the Dunkley situation? If so, I suspect there is a good chance that the Bulldogs expect to trade Dunkley out this week.

Personally, a team with Dunks and Jong in it is a far better side.

[Bulldog4life]

Why the hell did Collingwood do this?



If you had his contract would you walk away and renegotiate those sort of dollars.

Coillingwood already asked Treloar to take a pay cut and he said no.

[Bulldog4life]

If Dunkley wants to go we need a player same age group to replace him. Tell The Bummers if they wat Dunkley we'll have Ridley. Take it or leave it.

[comrade]

The social media scuttlebutt is that Hurley is being put up as part of the Dunkley trade.

Please, no. He had his chance to join us and stiffed us at the last moment. Hurley can get stuffed.

[comrade]

If Dunkley wants to go we need a player same age group to replace him. Tell The Bummers if they wat Dunkley we'll have Ridley. Take it or leave it.

Ridley, Draper or Tippa are the only 3 I'd consider from Essendon.

[GVGjr]

The social media scuttlebutt is that Hurley is being put up as part of the Dunkley trade.

Please, no. He had his chance to join us and stiffed us at the last moment. Hurley can get stuffed.

That is my thoughts as well. I'd rather keep Trengove than have Hurley

[Yankee Hotel Foxtrot]

That is my thoughts as well. I'd rather keep Trengove than have Hurley

It would boggle the mind that we'd bring in Hurley when it seems Trengove can't get a look in.. Why would we bring in another slow tall, who is actually past his prime?

[Happy Days]

Hurley is worthless. No way he's a tentpole of this deal (I hope).

[comrade]

Hurley is worthless. No way he's a tentpole of this deal (I hope).

I wouldn't think he'd be a crucial element, but I don't want any part of him at all, even as steak knives.

[Mofra]

It would boggle the mind that we'd bring in Hurley when it seems Trengove can't get a look in.. Why would we bring in another slow tall, who is actually past his prime?

Hurley is too short to take modern no 1 KPFs. He's Bont's height, no chance he stands the 200cm, monsters roaming aroudn forwardlines these days. Reeks of an Essendon salary dump.

[Topdog]

Hurley is finished as a player. Hooker too

[bornadog]

Hurley is too short to take modern no 1 KPFs. He's Bont's height, no chance he stands the 200cm, monsters roaming aroudn forwardlines these days. Reeks of an Essendon salary dump.

Hurley is finished as a player. Hooker too

Totally agree

[bulldogsthru&thru]

Honestly, I don't know why we'd even consider trading Dunkley to Essendon. Sure, be open about it with 16 other clubs but just don't even bother with them.

[Sedat]

The social media scuttlebutt is that Hurley is being put up as part of the Dunkley trade.

Please, no. He had his chance to join us and stiffed us at the last moment. Hurley can get stuffed.

If he was still an elite key defender, he'd be worth some consideration as steak knives (given his age) but he has been phoning it in the last couple of seasons. No thanks on any level.

Why would we now want to help Essendon fix up their rampant salary cap issues from 4 years ago when they had to sign all the drugged up 34 on massive over-inflated contracts? Let the bastards rot.

[soupman]

Can we be linked to a single player who might actually improve us and whose currently club is completely unconcerned about the prospect of losing?

Hannan is the closest thing to a required player we have targeted and he is a fringe forward at bloody Melbourne.