-
30-09-2022, 08:00 PM
#2911
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
The auntie thing was gross.
See what I did there..?
Thanks.
I'm here every night. Two shows on the weekend. Try the fish!
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
30-09-2022, 08:02 PM
#2912
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
So you're saying that the extra money he'll be getting is 50k per year more than we offered?
Let's say our offer is $650K p.a. gross, across six years that's $3.9M. Take out tax and that's $1.95M net.
Brisbane's offer is $750K p.a. gross, across six years that's $4.5M. Take out tax and that's $2.25M net.
The gross difference p.a. is $100K, net is $50K p.a., but as Mof states only if you're cursed by a shitty accountant.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
30-09-2022, 08:47 PM
#2913
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
jeemak
Just so I'm clear, are you comparing a net figure with a gross figure?
Yes out of laziness to calculate PAYG amounts as I was on my phone. But the point is valid, when you are earning that much, how you invest and how you spend your money is a bigger factor than the extra amount he could earn. There is no way I’m leaving somewhere I even remotely like for that much extra per year, but understands everyone’s circumstances are very different.
Also, it’s very hard to dodge the system no matter how good your accountant is if you are earning PAYG income. He would also have other steams of revenue in sponsorship and appearances fees, which again dilutes the additional salary amount further.
-
30-09-2022, 08:52 PM
#2914
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
angelopetraglia
Yes out of laziness to calculate PAYG amounts as I was on my phone. But the point is valid, when you are earning that much, how your invest and how you spend you money is a bigger factor than the extra amount he could earn. There is no way I’m leaving somewhere I even remotely like for that much extra per year, but understands everyone’s circumstances are very different.
Also, it’s very hard to dodge the system no matter how good your accountant is if you are earning PAYG income. He would also have other steams of revenue in sponsorship and appearances fees, which again dilutes the additional salary amount further.
I think for ten per cent I agree with you, but when you start talking 20% it gets a bit more tasty. Especially when your major earning years are likely going to be in the first 30% of your working life.
Anyway, it wasn't a decision about money. He wanted to be closer to his sister, his best mate's partner and child, and his partner's family.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
30-09-2022, 09:02 PM
#2915
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
So after tax.
Bulldogs offer @ $650K is nett $374K
Lions offer @ $750K (worst case result as reports are $700 to $750K) is $427K
The difference is 14%.
(In my line of work if someone left every time they were offered 14% more there would be no one left).
-
30-09-2022, 09:04 PM
#2916
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
jeemak
I think for ten per cent I agree with you, but when you start talking 20% it gets a bit more tasty. Especially when your major earning years are likely going to be in the first 30% of your working life.
Anyway, it wasn't a decision about money. He wanted to be closer to his sister, his best mate's partner and child, and his partner's family.
Definitely had nothing to do with the Bulldogs.
He loved us.
Pretty much said if you see him and show your membership you can crash at his second house.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
30-09-2022, 09:07 PM
#2917
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
50% extra to his stylist.
-
30-09-2022, 09:13 PM
#2918
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
ReLoad
50% extra to his stylist.
Still not enough
"It's over. It's all over."
-
30-09-2022, 09:28 PM
#2919
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
jeemak
I think for ten per cent I agree with you, but when you start talking 20% it gets a bit more tasty. Especially when your major earning years are likely going to be in the first 30% of your working life.
Anyway, it wasn't a decision about money. He wanted to be closer to his sister, his best mate's partner and child, and his partner's family.
In that order.
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
30-09-2022, 10:08 PM
#2920
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
4EC8D9A4-3D66-498F-B35E-1026028A67BF.jpeg
This was on Trade Radio earlier. What do people think of this? I’m still not convinced that we need Lobb but hey.
-
30-09-2022, 10:21 PM
#2921
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
Scraggers
I want more.
I'd rather we separate the deals - 2022 & 2023 first from Brissie for Dunkley, with late 2022 picks going back to the Lions.
Lobb for our second rounder. I'd rather not, but he's contracted so we have to pony up. May even need to add a future pick to the deal.
Bruce went for a 2nd & a 3rd
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
30-09-2022, 10:26 PM
#2922
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
Scraggers
Basically the same cost we paid for Bruce. It’s a on the higher side. But I could live with it.
Dunkley for less than two first rounders is unacceptable. Unless there’s a player traded to us from Brisbane to cover the future pick only being second round.
Edit: Mof beat me to the punch. What he said!
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
30-09-2022, 10:31 PM
#2923
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
Scraggers
It sort of works but we aren't getting a decent return for Dunkley.
If Brisbane work hard and get pick 7 for us it creates some opportunities.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
01-10-2022, 12:26 PM
#2924
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Originally Posted by
Scraggers
Not tonight, Josephine. So begins the media's irritating but predictable underrating of our players at the trade table.
I haven't seen a lot of discussion on exactly how Brisbane are going to get the draft points they need while still offering us something suitable for Dunkley? So far as I can see pick swapping won't get them there and they need to let go of at least one quality player, has anyone seen any reporting on who that might be? We can't become the victim of their problems.
'And the Western suburbs erupt!'
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
01-10-2022, 12:30 PM
#2925
Re: Trade Dunkley? Not tonight Josephine.
Id want 7 and 15 this year for Dunkley. Bris don’t need them so it makes sense.
I’ll be disappointed with anything else.
I will never see #16 the same!!