-
12-10-2022, 04:55 PM
#3646
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
DOG GOD
IF. Time will tell.
The other move gives us nothing.
I still have no idea why people think that's a good idea.
We've moved the needle a bit with that threat now we need to take it and move onto Lobb.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
12-10-2022, 04:55 PM
#3647
Re: Trade Dunkley
Hate to tell you 34 for 39 is meaningless. They will burn through all the picks in between 34 and 38 except for a Melbourne pick in matching bids.
It's a one pick upgrade... not quite a deal breaker.
Math: They have 34, 35, 36 and 38 all burned through.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
12-10-2022, 04:56 PM
#3648
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
hujsh
Well, the board approved Sam's ability to refuse for less than that, doesn't mean he can't use his judgement on deals that come close
Fair enough.
I’m just pissed it was never a trade we were going to win. Bris made sure of that.
I will never see #16 the same!!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
12-10-2022, 04:57 PM
#3649
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
The other move gives us nothing.
I still have no idea why people think that's a good idea.
We've moved the needle a bit with that threat now we need to take it and move onto Lobb.
When players can walk to the PSD and get pickedup then we really have everything to lose. I don't like the negotiating tactic
Nic stevens
Luke Ball
they all eventually got to their clubs of choice when trades not able to get done.
-
12-10-2022, 04:57 PM
#3650
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
The other move gives us nothing.
I still have no idea why people think that's a good idea.
We've moved the needle a bit with that threat now we need to take it and move onto Lobb.
Well it gives us the satisfaction Dunkley wouldn’t play for bris.
And if he did then the AFL would need to look at how on earth he got past everyone else.
I will never see #16 the same!!
-
12-10-2022, 04:58 PM
#3651
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
DOG GOD
Fair enough.
I’m just pissed it was never a trade we were going to win. Bris made sure of that.
Regardless of pick numbers if we get 2 x 200+ gamers with our selections have we won the trade?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
12-10-2022, 04:59 PM
#3652
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
DOG GOD
As soon as they traded 15 we should’ve walked away. Was always going to be unders from that moment.
That was a smart arse move by them
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
12-10-2022, 04:59 PM
#3653
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
macca
When players can walk to the PSD and get pickedup then we really have everything to lose. I don't like the negotiating tactic
Nic stevens
Luke Ball
they all eventually got to their clubs of choice when trades not able to get done.
Didn't Nick Stevens want to go to Collingwood? Ended up at Carlton.
-
12-10-2022, 05:00 PM
#3654
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
Didn't Nick Stevens want to go to Collingwood? Ended up at Carlton.
Correct
I will never see #16 the same!!
-
12-10-2022, 05:01 PM
#3655
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
bornadog
That was a smart arse move by them
Exactly.
I will never see #16 the same!!
-
12-10-2022, 05:01 PM
#3656
Re: Trade Dunkley
21 + F1 isnt fantastic but it also isnt shit. Our 2 x 1sts was always going to be a late 1st, now its just an early 2nd.
-
12-10-2022, 05:02 PM
#3657
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
Didn't Nick Stevens want to go to Collingwood? Ended up at Carlton.
I thought he ended up with the Barwon Prison 'Breakers' for bashing his wife?
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
12-10-2022, 05:12 PM
#3658
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
I thought he ended up with the Barwon Prison 'Breakers' for bashing his wife?
He ended up at Carlton after going to PSD. Port won the premiership the year after.
He is a scum bag
AFL star jailed over sickening bashing of glamorous girlfriend that left her with a permanent injury now cruelly claims he's innocent - and only pleaded guilty to get a lighter sentence
Nick Stevens played 104 games for Carlton and 127 for Port Adelaide
He was charged in 2014 over a savage assault on then partner Laima McKenna
In March 2015, Stevens was sentenced to eight months jail but appealed
He pleaded guilty in July 2016 and was sentenced to six months jail
Ms McKenna said he had ruined her life after he put her through 'hell'
Stevens admitted to bashing Ms McKenna, including kicking her on the ground
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
12-10-2022, 05:26 PM
#3659
Re: Trade Dunkley
Jon Ralph
@RalphyHeraldSun
Developing news on Dunkley. Understand Brisbane has now offered 21 and a future first rounder without asking for the Dogs' 39 back, which was their initial offer. It's still not what the Dogs want but it's definitely closer to acceptable.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
12-10-2022, 05:30 PM
#3660
Re: Trade Dunkley
Add Rayner or Lohmann and get some/many points back.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023