-
09-11-2020, 01:19 PM
#1336
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
kruder
If Treloar is too complex and there isn't another serious player to be had then Dunkley has to stay. Pick 8 even if it's turned into a first-round next year not interested. Be strong Sammy.
Great to see we have signed Jong once more. In the best 22 when fit and healthy. Pace, strong tackler who takes a great overhead mark.
I just wonder whether his signing now is due to the Dunkley situation? If so, I suspect there is a good chance that the Bulldogs expect to trade Dunkley out this week.
Personally, a team with Dunks and Jong in it is a far better side.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
09-11-2020, 02:00 PM
#1337
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Why the hell did Collingwood do this?
If you had his contract would you walk away and renegotiate those sort of dollars.
Coillingwood already asked Treloar to take a pay cut and he said no.
-
09-11-2020, 02:04 PM
#1338
Re: Trade Dunkley
If Dunkley wants to go we need a player same age group to replace him. Tell The Bummers if they wat Dunkley we'll have Ridley. Take it or leave it.
-
09-11-2020, 02:05 PM
#1339
Re: Trade Dunkley
The social media scuttlebutt is that Hurley is being put up as part of the Dunkley trade.
Please, no. He had his chance to join us and stiffed us at the last moment. Hurley can get stuffed.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 4 Likes
-
09-11-2020, 02:06 PM
#1340
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
If Dunkley wants to go we need a player same age group to replace him. Tell The Bummers if they wat Dunkley we'll have Ridley. Take it or leave it.
Ridley, Draper or Tippa are the only 3 I'd consider from Essendon.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
09-11-2020, 02:06 PM
#1341
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
comrade
The social media scuttlebutt is that Hurley is being put up as part of the Dunkley trade.
Please, no. He had his chance to join us and stiffed us at the last moment. Hurley can get stuffed.
That is my thoughts as well. I'd rather keep Trengove than have Hurley
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
09-11-2020, 02:11 PM
#1342
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
That is my thoughts as well. I'd rather keep Trengove than have Hurley
It would boggle the mind that we'd bring in Hurley when it seems Trengove can't get a look in.. Why would we bring in another slow tall, who is actually past his prime?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
09-11-2020, 02:12 PM
#1343
Re: Trade Dunkley
Hurley is worthless. No way he's a tentpole of this deal (I hope).
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
09-11-2020, 02:14 PM
#1344
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
Happy Days
Hurley is worthless. No way he's a tentpole of this deal (I hope).
I wouldn't think he'd be a crucial element, but I don't want any part of him at all, even as steak knives.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
09-11-2020, 02:15 PM
#1345
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
It would boggle the mind that we'd bring in Hurley when it seems Trengove can't get a look in.. Why would we bring in another slow tall, who is actually past his prime?
Hurley is too short to take modern no 1 KPFs. He's Bont's height, no chance he stands the 200cm, monsters roaming aroudn forwardlines these days. Reeks of an Essendon salary dump.
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
09-11-2020, 02:24 PM
#1346
Re: Trade Dunkley
Hurley is finished as a player. Hooker too
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
09-11-2020, 02:50 PM
#1347
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
Mofra
Hurley is too short to take modern no 1 KPFs. He's Bont's height, no chance he stands the 200cm, monsters roaming aroudn forwardlines these days. Reeks of an Essendon salary dump.
Originally Posted by
Topdog
Hurley is finished as a player. Hooker too
Totally agree
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
09-11-2020, 02:53 PM
#1348
Re: Trade Dunkley
Honestly, I don't know why we'd even consider trading Dunkley to Essendon. Sure, be open about it with 16 other clubs but just don't even bother with them.
-
09-11-2020, 03:10 PM
#1349
Re: Trade Dunkley
Originally Posted by
comrade
The social media scuttlebutt is that Hurley is being put up as part of the Dunkley trade.
Please, no. He had his chance to join us and stiffed us at the last moment. Hurley can get stuffed.
If he was still an elite key defender, he'd be worth some consideration as steak knives (given his age) but he has been phoning it in the last couple of seasons. No thanks on any level.
Why would we now want to help Essendon fix up their rampant salary cap issues from 4 years ago when they had to sign all the drugged up 34 on massive over-inflated contracts? Let the bastards rot.
"Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
09-11-2020, 03:13 PM
#1350
Re: Trade Dunkley
Can we be linked to a single player who might actually improve us and whose currently club is completely unconcerned about the prospect of losing?
Hannan is the closest thing to a required player we have targeted and he is a fringe forward at bloody Melbourne.
I should leave it alone but you're not right
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes