-
03-11-2020, 06:53 PM
#1036
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
soupaman
Weird target. At the time we had both Campbell and Roughead fighting it out for the number one spot, with Boyd as adequate support. Unless we saw Nankervis leapfrogging those guys why would we get him?
Maybe we knew Campbell wasn’t up to it and wanted Boyd forward?
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
03-11-2020, 07:07 PM
#1037
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
soupaman
Weird target. At the time we had both Campbell and Roughead fighting it out for the number one spot, with Boyd as adequate support. Unless we saw Nankervis leapfrogging those guys why would we get him?
Did we foresee Rough’s struggles without 3rd man up?
I remember Nank choosing Richmond, you can imagine he saw the greater opportunity to play seniors at Punt Rd.
How different would we look if he chose us?
Float Along - Fill Your Lungs
-
03-11-2020, 07:10 PM
#1038
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
The Pie Man
Did we foresee Rough’s struggles without 3rd man up?
I remember Nank choosing Richmond, you can imagine he saw the greater opportunity to play seniors at Punt Rd.
How different would we look if he chose us?
I wonder if it was the fact that we recruited Cloke and had thrown a bucket load at Hurley as reasons why he thought opportunities with us were a bit more limited than they really were
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
03-11-2020, 07:20 PM
#1039
Re: List Management for 2020/21
I call bullshit on that. The Dogs are pretty much all I care about and I didn’t hear a thing about us getting Nank.
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
03-11-2020, 07:48 PM
#1040
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
Happy Days
I call bullshit on that. The Dogs are pretty much all I care about and I didn’t hear a thing about us getting Nank.
Sam Landsberger tweet 14/10/16
Why no progress on Toby Nankervis? The big bloke is holidaying overseas. Swans want to keep him, but Tigers and Dogs have prepared offers.
Float Along - Fill Your Lungs
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
03-11-2020, 09:48 PM
#1041
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
I wonder if it was the fact that we recruited Cloke and had thrown a bucket load at Hurley as reasons why he thought opportunities with us were a bit more limited than they really were
Thanks for the reminder. Cloke was another proven non ruckman who failed in the ruck and Then disappears .
similarities between Cloke, Trengove, Boyd, Schache, Young, Campbell, Roughy.
A few games in the ruck seems to prevent having a long career at the Dogs.
-
03-11-2020, 10:12 PM
#1042
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
The Pie Man
Sam Landsberger tweet 14/10/16
Why no progress on Toby Nankervis? The big bloke is holidaying overseas. Swans want to keep him, but Tigers and Dogs have prepared offers.
You didn’t have to do me like that cuz
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
03-11-2020, 10:17 PM
#1043
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
Happy Days
You didn’t have to do me like that cuz
You can feel better knowing the one time (i.e just then) I had someone cold was on something this trivial
He played well in their semi in 16 and didn’t play again that year. Big what if
Float Along - Fill Your Lungs
-
04-11-2020, 05:09 PM
#1044
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Listened to Dodoro on trade Radio.
* gave nothing away about Dunkley, says he is contracted , so unfair to discuss.
"It's an awkward one, because when you're dealing with a contracted player it makes it hard. We do have an interest in Josh, we've had some preliminary chats with the Bulldogs. The Bulldogs are pretty resolute they want to keep him and we respect that"
* He admitted an approach was made, but Dogs said he is contracted.
"We are certainly asking the question... It is only the start of the trade period and anything happen can happen between now and next Thursday"
* Will continue to see if a deal can be reached.
The other interesting thing he said was the List managers are all assuming lists will be cut to 38, so they are working on that number.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
04-11-2020, 05:55 PM
#1045
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Listened to Dodoro on trade Radio.
* gave nothing away about Dunkley, says he is contracted , so unfair to discuss.
* He admitted an approach was made, but Dogs said he is contracted.
* Will continue to see if a deal can be reached.
The other interesting thing he said was the List managers are all assuming lists will be cut to 38, so they are working on that number.
Yikes Dodo sounds more measured than the journos
-
04-11-2020, 05:57 PM
#1046
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
Yikes Dodo sounds more measured than the journos
He also denied he asked for several players from Port for Fantasia, who has a year left on his contract
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
04-11-2020, 07:30 PM
#1047
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
Yikes Dodo sounds more measured than the journos
That is a very low bar.
Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured
-
05-11-2020, 07:11 PM
#1048
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Never mind we've been knocked back by half a dozen others ahead of you on our list but Big Stef, come on down.
BORDERLINE FLYING
-
05-11-2020, 07:12 PM
#1049
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
Rocket Science
Never mind we've been knocked back by half a dozen others ahead of you on our list but Big Stef, come on down.
That's not how you spell Goldstein
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 5 Likes
-
05-11-2020, 07:27 PM
#1050
Re: List Management for 2020/21
Originally Posted by
Rocket Science
Never mind we've been knocked back by half a dozen others ahead of you on our list but Big Stef, come on down.
So uninspiring.
He's absolutely done.
I'd rather Ben Hudson.