Thanks Thanks:  12
Likes Likes:  160
Page 24 of 24 FirstFirst ... 1415161718192021222324
Results 346 to 351 of 351
  1. #346
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,734
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2021 Trade Target/s

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    I posted 3 names last week. They would be willing to deal
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  2. #347
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,779
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2021 Trade Target/s

    So SEN prints an article a day or to ago talking about us targetting a KPD, and it appears to be only the second priority. The vague info I'm getting is "ruck won't be an issue next year".
    No idea who we're taregtting but we aren't looking at anyone who needs to develop and there's aren't too many 'gettable' rucks are there?
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  3. #348
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,639
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2021 Trade Target/s

    My money is on Mason Cox!
    Listening to Brahm's 3rd Racket

  4. #349
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,779
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2021 Trade Target/s

    Quote Originally Posted by The Doctor View Post
    My money is on Mason Cox!
    The case against is the indicate from power we'd be 'more agrressive' at teh trade table and Cox would cost about as much as Collingwood paid for Roughead.

    My left-field option is Nankervis. Would cost overs by Richmond look set to hold onto Doldo & CCJ who are an ideal pairing. We can pay overs and get late picks back without hurting our actual draft posiiton (w're taking Darcy anyway).

    Pipe dream, but we do look set to do something extraordinary and as far as football adminsitrators go I have about as much faith in Sam Power as I did in Peter Gordon.
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  5. #350
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,639
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2021 Trade Target/s

    Quote Originally Posted by Mofra View Post
    The case against is the indicate from power we'd be 'more agrressive' at teh trade table and Cox would cost about as much as Collingwood paid for Roughead.

    My left-field option is Nankervis. Would cost overs by Richmond look set to hold onto Doldo & CCJ who are an ideal pairing. We can pay overs and get late picks back without hurting our actual draft posiiton (w're taking Darcy anyway).

    Pipe dream, but we do look set to do something extraordinary and as far as football adminsitrators go I have about as much faith in Sam Power as I did in Peter Gordon.
    Well I hope your right.

    I posted a few months back that Nankervis would be the ideal fit for us. If it costs overs this is the time to do it with a list that is seriously challenging.
    Listening to Brahm's 3rd Racket

  6. #351
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Algester, Qld
    Posts
    8,268
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: 2021 Trade Target/s

    Quote Originally Posted by Mofra View Post
    So SEN prints an article a day or to ago talking about us targetting a KPD, and it appears to be only the second priority. The vague info I'm getting is "ruck won't be an issue next year".
    No idea who we're taregtting but we aren't looking at anyone who needs to develop and there's aren't too many 'gettable' rucks are there?
    Ooooh, let me guess, Nic Bruton is finally ready for AFL football and making a comeback at age 40 something??

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •