Thanks Thanks:  14
Likes Likes:  116
Page 8 of 18 FirstFirst 1234567891011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 106 to 120 of 264
  1. #106
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Algester, Qld
    Posts
    8,181
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    I must be in the minority, but I thought Cordy was pretty good.

  2. #107
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    E.J. Whitten Stand
    Posts
    17,162
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    Last time around Cordy did the job on Riewoldt holding him to just 1 goal which was from a mark in the goal square when he gave Zaine a big shove in the back that wasn't picked up on.

    The game has changed, but in our last outing Dusty, Aarts and Castagna combined for 8 goals as we were touched up at ground level.
    Aarts is another that Wood could match up on. Basically the smaller the better for Easton.
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

  3. #108
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,207
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyberdoggie View Post
    I think what Buku brings is someone like Gardner that can read the play well, jump higher than most and effectively spoil.
    Except he is also agile and has good skills.

    How much of today's current football is physical wresting between a key forward like Hawkins and a key back. I'd say less this year than last year. I'd bring Buku in for JJ who has been a real disappointment of late. Only 161 meters gained for the match. Only better than Vanders, English, McNeil (sub), Jong (subbed), Keath and Scott.

    Young was ordinary in the reserves game, West and Lippa were standouts and deserve a chance.

    Who to come in for Tim is a difficult decision, i think Bevo will go with Sweet.
    JJ has been playing within himself, but when it's been his time to 'go' he actually has - a knock on him in the past.

    Not sure the metres gained stat is useful here either, given his role has significantly changed.

    JJ isn't in danger of being dropped but I do hope his form can lift.
    W00F!

  4. Likes Testekill, Bulldog4life liked this post
  5. #109
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    9,036
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Hotel Foxtrot View Post
    I must be in the minority, but I thought Cordy was pretty good.
    I thought he was ok too - though a couple of times he did look slow.
    "It's over. It's all over."

  6. #110
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,896
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Hotel Foxtrot View Post
    I must be in the minority, but I thought Cordy was pretty good.
    I thought he was pretty good too. I also thought he was pretty good last year, but he’s also looked full on horrible in the seconds games I’ve seen this year, so a bit of apprehension is understandable.
    - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

  7. #111
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,233
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Out : Dunkley, English, Jong, Vandermeer.
    In: Lipinski, Schache, Hannan, West.

    Love to see JUH come in but I don't think it's going to happen.

  8. Likes GVGjr liked this post
  9. #112
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    60,880
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    Out : Dunkley, English, Jong, Vandermeer.
    In: Lipinski, Schache, Hannan, West.

    Love to see JUH come in but I don't think it's going to happen.
    So McNeil sub?
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  10. #113
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,739
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Yankee Hotel Foxtrot View Post
    I must be in the minority, but I thought Cordy was pretty good.
    I thought Cordy was ok. Not sure what people expect.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  11. #114
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    60,880
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by mjp View Post
    I can't tell you how much I'm enjoying the Gardner commentary in 2021.

    Can we just ease up a bit on Cordy for a second or two though (and this isn't about your post Mofra or your post Kruder) - it was his FIRST GAME in > 6 months...he's probably going to be a bit rusty. I thought he played with effort and energy and whilst I know we don't like to admit it GWS have Himmelberg, Finlayson and Ricardi all running around (not to mention Greene) and whilst none are world beaters all are competent AFL players who have to be defended...we kept them to NINE goals.
    We agree on this one.

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    GWS had three players over 195cm in their forward line and they kicked 1 goal. I think Cordy did his job without being a star.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  12. #115
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,233
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    So McNeil sub?
    Good question. He was good when he came on. I get confused with the ins and out re the sub!
    Hannan I wouldn't have as a sub in his first game, so maybe McNeil again if we think he needs a rest.
    JJ a possibility too.

  13. #116
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    60,880
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    Good question. He was good when he came on. I get confused with the ins and out re the sub!
    Hannan I wouldn't have as a sub in his first game, so maybe McNeil again if we think he needs a rest.
    JJ a possibility too.
    I think a few have got the sub mixed up.

    McNeil is officially not in the 22, so either he is in for another eg Vanda or sub, or not in at all.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  14. Thanks Grantysghost thanked for this post
    Likes azabob liked this post
  15. #117
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    9,036
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    maybe McNeil again if we think he needs a rest.
    Did it hurt you to say this?
    "It's over. It's all over."

  16. #118
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,052
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    So McNeil sub?
    BAD I think you are the only one who understands if the activated SUB is in the 22 or not!

    I think I finally have my head around it and for McNeil to play in the 22 next week he has to be named as an in.
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  17. #119
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,052
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    I think a few have got the sub mixed up.

    McNeil is officially not in the 22, so either he is in for another eg Vanda or sub, or not in at all.
    Is this the most diplomatic you have ever been?
    More of an In Bruges guy?

  18. Likes Grantysghost liked this post
  19. #120
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    60,880
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Round 7 Vs Richmond 2021

    Quote Originally Posted by azabob View Post
    BAD I think you are the only one who understands if the activated SUB is in the 22 or not!

    I think I finally have my head around it and for McNeil to play in the 22 next week he has to be named as an in.
    Replaces who?

    I think he should take Vanders role (if he is a definite out) We need pace as Richmond has plenty to burn.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •