Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
The angle they showed on TV was crap. Maybe they have better cameras from the opposite side?
The one where Daniel appeared to have touched the ball on the mark was the most dubious. The field umpire, metres away, immediately called it touched. On an evening with much less crowd noise than usual, he almost certainly picked up the noise of a deflection as well as being able to see any deviation. Why did it even have to be reviewed? Why put our faith in dodgy technology instead?