Re: Archer's comments regarding us
Originally Posted by
Pembleton
Great post.
I deliberately made my question conceptual rather than Dogs specific, because this thread seems to rebuff not just Archer's opinion, but also the reasonableness of criticising Smorgan in relation to our on field performance.
I think we have been worse than intermittently crap, given we've got a best finish of 6th in an 8 year period (worst of any club in same period?). The president should get credit for the good things he does, and criticism for the mistakes he makes. Although even reasonable criticisims of Smorgan (and there are reasonable criticisms to be made) seem completely unpalatable to a lot of Dogs fans.
Not sure about accepting crapness. What is it to not accept crapness anyway?
To be honest I was feeling a little sillly when I posted, Smorgon has built up a lot of good will amongst the fans but I think he definitely has to answer for some of his less palatable actions. I thought his crack at Eade last year was poor, and looked like fan appeasing blame. Surely if we're a team we can't jus blame one person especially in public, everyone needs to be pulling together. Hopefully the off-season review has fixed some of this. I think Archer is a very ordinary media presence but he's got the right to his opinion much like anyone else and he'll probably try to be controversial to keep up with the jones's on FC.
Park that car
Drop that phone
Sleep on the floor
Dream about me