-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
Can we ever get to a point where he says he's going but we can still embrace him whilst we have him? I feel we are a bit immature re this.
Originally Posted by
Bulldog Joe
Regardless of contracts we pick our best side.
Nothing else matters when you chasing the ultimate prize.
Agree, pick the best side
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
So I ask this, ‘IF’ Richards isn’t going to sign &/or play elsewhere next year, should that change anything?
Put Daniel into that HB role and free up a spot for Garcia to play a outside mid/forward role? The experience to Garcia would be immense and benefit us long term.
Or is it just pick the best available and give others a taste next year?
You're a scallywag through and though BT.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
So I ask this, ‘IF’ Richards isn’t going to sign &/or play elsewhere next year, should that change anything?
Put Daniel into that HB role and free up a spot for Garcia to play a outside mid/forward role? The experience to Garcia would be immense and benefit us long term.
Or is it just pick the best available and give others a taste next year?
You really want Ed gone, huh? Just get jee to start a thread already!
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
So I ask this, ‘IF’ Richards isn’t going to sign &/or play elsewhere next year, should that change anything?
Put Daniel into that HB role and free up a spot for Garcia to play a outside mid/forward role? The experience to Garcia would be immense and benefit us long term.
Or is it just pick the best available and give others a taste next year?
Do we want to win a flag or cut our nose to spite our face?
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Originally Posted by
azabob
You really want Ed gone, huh? Just get jee to start a thread already!
It's the obvious thing to do but he's too proud to ask me to do it.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Originally Posted by
jeemak
It's the obvious thing to do but he's too proud to ask me to do it.
DO NOT START THAT THREAD
Ed Richards has many stans and we’re not all well balanced individuals.
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Originally Posted by
jeemak
It's the obvious thing to do but he's too proud to ask me to do it.
Ok. It’s time.
Originally Posted by
The Underdog
DO NOT START THAT THREAD
Ed Richards has many stans and we’re not all well balanced individuals.
Oh no. What have you done Jeemak?
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Updated: Assumption of needing three KPD’s, one who also is the Second Ruck
B: Duryea Gardner Schache (2nd Ruck)
HB: Dale Keath Williams
C: Hunter Dunkley Richards
HF: Treloar Bontempelli Weightman
F: Jamarra Naughton Vandermeer
R: English Macrae Liberatore
Int: Wood (Def) B. Smith (Mid) Daniel (Mid) Garcia or Hannan (For)
Sub: Garcia or Hannan
Emerg: JJ R. Smith Scott Cordy
Depth: McNeil Lipinski Young West Wallis
Unavailable: Martin (Most Likely), Bruce (ACL), McLean (ACL), Jong (Ret.)
Notes:
- Bontempelli replaces Bruce. Other mids should win enough of the ball. Bonts leads well, has good height and size, but is a great snapper too. Would need to work on his set shots. We need to replace 2.5 goals a game from Bruce. Bonts can do that.
- English the main ruck. Sweet not ready for a final & Martin’s body is shot unfortunately. Bruce no longer able to provide a chop out. Young unlikely to be selected. So Schache is that second ruck, coming from being #3 KPD.
- I’m thinking speed and natural forward instincts is the mix. I’ve got speed covered, but also three over 193cm+ as targets plus Weightman’s aerial ability.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
B: Doc, Gardner, Wood
HB: Dale, Keath, Williams
C: Hunter, Bont, Caleb
HF: Treloar, English, VDM
F: Dunks, Naughts, Cody
R: Stef, Macrae, Libba
Int: Baz, Richards, Marra, Hannan
Sub: JJ
-----------------------------------------------------------
- Lewy in for Stef if he doesn't come up
- Schache in for any of the tall defenders if they aren't right
- Scott, Roarke and Garcia there as back ups
- Unsure of the balance with Ed. He has to play off HBF for mine. Not sure how we play Caleb.
- Dunks, Adz to rotate with others forward
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
I don’t get it. Everyone wants Hannan as our saviour.
6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 9 represents his possessions in half of his games this year. Rarely gets the ball. Fumbles a lot.
1 in 5 of his possessions are listed as clangers. I must have missed his good stuff.
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
Originally Posted by
Danjul
I don’t get it. Everyone wants Hannan as our saviour.
6, 7, 7, 7, 8, 9 represents his possessions in half of his games this year. Rarely gets the ball. Fumbles a lot.
1 in 5 of his possessions are listed as clangers. I must have missed his good stuff.
Who has said anything remotely close to him being our 'saviour'?
Legit question, not a statement. I haven't read all the comments etc.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
Re: Your Best 22 for Finals
I mean, I guess its technically true that I want Hannan to be the saviour?
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -