Thanks Thanks:  18
Likes Likes:  234
Page 14 of 35 FirstFirst ... 456789101112131415161718192021222324 ... LastLast
Results 196 to 210 of 521
  1. #196
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,651
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by comrade View Post
    2 tall forwards that haven’t been replaced stands out.
    We played 2 tall forwards on the weekend (English & Naughton) as opposed to 3 against Melb (Bruce, Naughton & JUH). Young has in essence replaced English in the ruck and English replaced one of Bruce or JUH.

    We also played 3 tall defenders and had Schache intercepting which we got pretty much none of on the weekend... Richards was very good too until concussed and has been replaced by a horribly out of form Wood.

  2. Thanks Prince Imperial thanked for this post
  3. #197
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    E.J. Whitten Stand
    Posts
    17,203
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    We played 2 tall forwards on the weekend (English & Naughton) as opposed to 3 against Melb (Bruce, Naughton & JUH). Young has in essence replaced English in the ruck and English replaced one of Bruce or JUH.

    We also played 3 tall defenders and had Schache intercepting which we got pretty much none of on the weekend... Richards was very good too until concussed and has been replaced by a horribly out of form Wood.
    The lack of height and marking power in D50 is such a direct contrast to every other good side.
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

  4. Likes DOG GOD liked this post
  5. #198
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by comrade View Post
    The lack of height and marking power in D50 is such a direct contrast to every other good side.
    And this is why Young and Schache should be there instead of Wood and Cordy.
    I will never see #16 the same!!

  6. Likes josie liked this post
  7. #199
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,651
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by DOG GOD View Post
    And this is why Young and Schache should be there instead of Wood and Cordy.
    But tHeY dOn'T dEfEnD weLl eNouGh.

    *As Cordy gets out-marked at least 3-4 times per game.

    And would take 3-4 intercept marks per game too!

  8. #200
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,701
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    But tHeY dOn'T dEfEnD weLl eNouGh.

    *As Cordy gets out-marked at least 3-4 times per game.

    And would take 3-4 intercept marks per game too!
    In Zaine's defence, does it count as being outmarked when you don't even get to the contest?

  9. #201
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,274
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    If Martin is close id risk him now and play Schache as the sub.

    This then means Young become second ruck/ defender hopefully to start agree we need to add marking power.

    With three tall defenders I think it gives us the ability to drop Wood and I would even consider JJ to play back at times now that Richards isnt an option to replace wood. Williams to go on the third tall when Young rucks.


    So Wood out for Martin. Also in 70 plus tackles I want it to look like a final not like a basketball game, a sunday stroll as it was last September. If we cant bring the basics that September requires no amount of structural change will help. Oh yeah mids the pressure starts with you! Yes that includes you Treloar and yes you Bailey Smith.

    I have a feeling Bevo will make 1-2 changes max.

  10. #202
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East of the West
    Posts
    9,137
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocco Jones View Post
    In Zaine's defence, does it count as being outmarked when you don't even get to the contest?
    4D chess.

    Can't have a "marked against" stat on you if you're not in the contest b
    "It's over. It's all over."

  11. #203
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,701
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by EasternWest View Post
    4D chess.

    Can't have a "marked against" stat on you if you're not in the contest b
    Only chess I'm into.

  12. #204
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,608
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozza View Post
    If we start jumping up and down about that - is that a sign of a club with focus split between something that occurred out of our control, and the game ahead of it this week?

    Its obviously an ordinary situation regardless.
    So we just lie down and ignore clear errors that affect our Club without saying anything ? None of Irene Chatfield, Susan Alberti, David Smorgon and Peter Gordon would have been neither obseqious nor silent.

  13. #205
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Sunshine
    Posts
    6,269
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by westbulldog View Post
    So we just lie down and ignore clear errors that affect our Club without saying anything ? None of Irene Chatfield, Susan Alberti, David Smorgon and Peter Gordon would have been neither obseqious nor silent.
    I wasn't advocating one way or another - just simply asking the question and highlighting that their are nuances and considerations to jumping up and down about it. Maybe the club has raised it with the AFL directly - and not done it through the media.

  14. Likes josie liked this post
  15. #206
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,211
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Luke Beveridge to reporters on ruckman Stefan Martin

    : "What do you think happens if we put a player out there who can't run the game out?

    "If we pick Stefan, we're taking a big risk. I'm not saying we won't."
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  16. #207
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,757
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Luke Beveridge to reporters on ruckman Stefan Martin
    Where was that? Was that today?

  17. #208
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,140
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Stefan's either not playing or is cherry ripe and Bevo's playing the game.
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  18. #209
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,211
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Quote Originally Posted by MrMahatma View Post
    Where was that? Was that today?
    This morning.

    I haven't seen the upload of the presser yet
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  19. #210
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    E.J. Whitten Stand
    Posts
    17,203
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Just roll the dice Bevo.
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •