-
27-05-2022, 05:41 PM
#106
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Good to see First Dog still fighting the good fight with #18 on his demands list...
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ist-of-demands
First dog.jpg
Wake me up when we get to heaven, let me sleep if we're going to hell
Good luck, for your sake I hope heaven and hell are really there, but I wouldn't hold my breath
And we all found heaven - 2016 Premiers!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 3 Thanks, 5 Likes
-
10-06-2022, 10:31 AM
#107
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
This ain't good. Third sex offender with links to us in 70s 80s.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-06-...970s/101138872
-
10-06-2022, 07:03 PM
#108
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
I don't believe this is on the club.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
10-06-2022, 09:01 PM
#109
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
bornadog
I don't believe this is on the club.
This is horrible information. So sorry for the victims.
I'm starting to become concerned, to be honest. Not saying the club is at fault (how would I know at this point), rather, I'm really concerned we've got an association with pedophiles and that there might have been a whole bunch of them using our club as a vehicle to molest children or facilitate the molestation of children.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
10-06-2022, 09:44 PM
#110
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
jeemak
This is horrible information. So sorry for the victims.
I'm starting to become concerned, to be honest. Not saying the club is at fault (how would I know at this point), rather, I'm really concerned we've got an association with pedophiles and that there might have been a whole bunch of them using our club as a vehicle to molest children or facilitate the molestation of children.
absolutely horrible
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
11-06-2022, 10:39 AM
#111
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
jeemak
This is horrible information. So sorry for the victims.
I'm starting to become concerned, to be honest. Not saying the club is at fault (how would I know at this point), rather, I'm really concerned we've got an association with pedophiles and that there might have been a whole bunch of them using our club as a vehicle to molest children or facilitate the molestation of children.
Unfortunately a fact of life that those so inclined infiltrate organisations that get them access.
Footy clubs in general would have people volunteering for other motives in the same way as scouts and other such organisations.
Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
11-06-2022, 12:41 PM
#112
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Photos of Bailey Smith with a bag of white powder are being investigated by the club
-
13-06-2022, 10:08 AM
#113
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Preuss and Briggs both played vFL this weekend. We have to be in Briggs' ear?
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
21-06-2022, 03:08 PM
#114
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Hopefully we are educating our players about the perils of online media and associating themselves and (by default) their club with controversial postings. Nine msn carried a segment of their footy show, which included a list of player "likes" for one of De Goey's online media posts.
Sad to say (at least) one of these was a current Bulldog player. Now you would have to be extremely naïve to not know that this video subject is contentious and probably may bring Jordan's club into disrepute. Why or why would you want to associate yourself with it on a personal level, and why would you want the club (by extension) also involved?
I know I am an old dinosaur, and things have changed, and you may wish to support Jordan. If so message him privately or phone him. But don't make it obvious to all and sundry. You must know it probably doesn't reflect well on your club.
ps: there were a number of players from other clubs who also need to have a think about this issue.
The truth will set you free,
but first it will piss you off. ... Gloria Steinem.
-
21-06-2022, 03:32 PM
#115
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
hujsh thanked for this post
-
21-06-2022, 04:15 PM
#116
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
jeemak
who was the player?
Jamarra.
-
21-06-2022, 04:17 PM
#117
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
Mantis
Jamarra.
JUH that's ignant.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
21-06-2022, 04:19 PM
#118
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
To be fair I was a complete idiot at 19 too. I would’ve likely cancelled De Goey but more performatively than with actual intent.
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
21-06-2022, 04:50 PM
#119
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
jeemak
Who was the player?
It's not important who the player was, its the principle of not getting your club involved (by association) with issues that they would prefer to distance themselves from. And no, it was not Jamarra. And I am not going to play twenty questions.
The truth will set you free,
but first it will piss you off. ... Gloria Steinem.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
21-06-2022, 05:00 PM
#120
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes