-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion

Originally Posted by
azabob
None other than Damien Barrett is president of the AMFA.
IF....Damian Barrett is president of the AMFA
THEN....I bet the toilets at the AMFA offices are strictly cubicles only
Last edited by Sedat; 20-09-2023 at 10:13 PM.
"Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 6 Likes
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion
Well if that isn’t a joke what is ?
Bring back the biff
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion
I can't believe Ch9 would appoint a Trump acolyte and misogynist to head up their reporting. Unprecedented.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion
Bailing out on Hutchy when the ships sinking after he gave him a life line.
Fair role though hard to say no to that.
Not consistently candid
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion

Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
Bailing out on Hutchy when the ships sinking after he gave him a life line.
Fair role though hard to say no to that.
Doesn't Ch9 and Hutchy's network share the same talent? I only see this as the continuation of the circle jerk that sees a repeat of the same tripe across SEN, Ch9 and The Age all week from the same idiots.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion
I honestly don't understand the mindset of people who get angry at this sort of stuff. The default setting in today's world seems to be anger and resentment, even over issues that have absolutely no bearing on ones own day-to-day life.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, he 100% owned his fark-up (as he should) and never played the mental health card (so beloved by other celebs with no shame). If he subsequently finds gainful employment and has a successful career reboot after having served his penance, good luck to him. Hopefully for his sake he doesn't forget the lessons learnt from his screw-up.
"Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 7 Likes
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion
What is a Chief Football Reporter? Do they have management responsibilities/influence over other staff members? I personally wouldn't trust this guy to be in charge of women yet. As in his attitude and treatment may not be up to snuff not because I expect him to do anything terrible.
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion

Originally Posted by
Sedat
I honestly don't understand the mindset of people who get angry at this sort of stuff. The default setting in today's world seems to be anger and resentment, even over issues that have absolutely no bearing on ones own day-to-day life.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, he 100% owned his fark-up (as he should) and never played the mental health card (so beloved by other celebs with no shame). If he subsequently finds gainful employment and has a successful career reboot after having served his penance, good luck to him. Hopefully for his sake he doesn't forget the lessons learnt from his screw-up.
Not sure anyone's that upset by it are they? But if they were, they might be because second chances - particularly in the media - seem to have a history of being given to a particular type.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion
I don’t really care about him owning his mistakes or whatever, I’m more just mystified at the insistence that he deserves and warrants a key job in the AFL media.
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion

Originally Posted by
Happy Days
I don’t really care about him owning his mistakes or whatever, I’m more just mystified at the insistence that he deserves and warrants a key job in the AFL media.
Are standards particularly high in this industry already?
"Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion

Originally Posted by
Sedat
Are standards particularly high in this industry already?
If they aren't (and let's face it the answer is they aren't) then i don't see how lowering the standards helps.
Here he comes, he's all dressed in black
P.R. shoes and and big straw hat
He's never early, he's always late
First thing you learn is that you always gotta wait
I'm waiting for my man.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion

Originally Posted by
Sedat
I honestly don't understand the mindset of people who get angry at this sort of stuff. The default setting in today's world seems to be anger and resentment, even over issues that have absolutely no bearing on ones own day-to-day life.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, he 100% owned his fark-up (as he should) and never played the mental health card (so beloved by other celebs with no shame). If he subsequently finds gainful employment and has a successful career reboot after having served his penance, good luck to him. Hopefully for his sake he doesn't forget the lessons learnt from his screw-up.
I find him highly annoying but his sacking from Fox and taking a backseat for a period of time was never going to be a life sentence.
He's right back in the thick of things now and providing he smartens up his act well good luck too him.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Beveridge v Morris in the court of public opinion

Originally Posted by
Sedat
I honestly don't understand the mindset of people who get angry at this sort of stuff. The default setting in today's world seems to be anger and resentment, even over issues that have absolutely no bearing on ones own day-to-day life.
As I mentioned earlier in the thread, he 100% owned his fark-up (as he should) and never played the mental health card (so beloved by other celebs with no shame). If he subsequently finds gainful employment and has a successful career reboot after having served his penance, good luck to him. Hopefully for his sake he doesn't forget the lessons learnt from his screw-up.
This offends me
"It's over. It's all over."
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes