Thanks Thanks:  9
Likes Likes:  74
Page 1 of 9 123456789 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 122
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,769
    Post Thanks / Like

    Trade hypotheticals

    Would you do it?

    Here's one - English for Barrass. Yay or nay?
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,978
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by Mofra View Post
    Would you do it?

    Here's one - English for Barrass. Yay or nay?
    No way!

    English had a great start to the year & hasn't quite been the same since the concussion. I feel he proved to me that he can be a first ruck & i like the Lobb interest. Thats when we looked our best last year with that forward/ruck being a genuine ruck option.

    Waited so long to see English be the player we hoped he would be & we can't trade him now.

  3. Thanks Bulldog4life thanked for this post
    Likes GVGjr liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,194
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by Mofra View Post
    Would you do it?

    Here's one - English for Barrass. Yay or nay?
    Big no. We are short on ruck options, and English is starting to show why he is so valuable.

    What about Barrass for Dunkley?
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,978
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Big no. We are short on ruck options, and English is starting to show why he is so valuable.

    What about Barrass for Dunkley?
    Is committing to Jones mean that going after another KPD is not needed?

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,714
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by anfo27 View Post
    Is committing to Jones mean that going after another KPD is not needed?
    I don't think so, it helps but I would consider getting another KPD in.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  7. Likes Stevo liked this post
  8. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,978
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    I don't think so, it helps but I would consider getting another KPD in.
    Is that with the thinking that we keep what we have now & add Jones & another or letting a Cordy go or someone else go & then add Jones & another?

  9. Likes Stevo liked this post
  10. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,714
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by anfo27 View Post
    Is that with the thinking that we keep what we have now & add Jones & another or letting a Cordy go or someone else go & then add Jones & another?
    If we were to land someone as good as Barrass along with Jones then you would have to think Cordy becomes surplus.
    It's not out of the question that we could bring in 2 key position defenders.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    If Keath retires, we will definitely need another QUALITY KPD…and even if he doesn’t, I have no confidence in Cordy, Gardner or O’Brien.
    I will never see #16 the same!!

  12. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    713
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by anfo27 View Post
    Is that with the thinking that we keep what we have now & add Jones & another or letting a Cordy go or someone else go & then add Jones & another?
    Gardner, Jones, Keath and O'Brien would give us plenty of depth. Barrass would gives us a leap in quality but failing that Cordy isn't a bad backup for another year.

  13. #10
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    713
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    What about Barrass for Dunkley?
    If Barrass wanted to come here and it was effectively a straight swap I would do it. Easier to find another mid. Strong draft for midfielders so we could replace Dunkley.

  14. Likes bornadog, josie liked this post
  15. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    1,978
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by Stevo View Post
    Gardner, Jones, Keath and O'Brien would give us plenty of depth. Barrass would gives us a leap in quality but failing that Cordy isn't a bad backup for another year.
    You're forgetting Darcy in that equation

  16. Likes Bulldog4life liked this post
  17. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kyabram
    Posts
    13,883
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Darcy isn't a KPD.
    The curse is dead.

  18. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    27,903
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by Mofra View Post
    Would you do it?

    Here's one - English for Barrass. Yay or nay?
    No. A ruckman like Tim only comes along once in a while. In ruckman terms he's still a baby and has a lot of growth in him. If he develops as we hope he could be on the most influential/top 5 players in the comp

    He can play 80%+ time in the ruck, he can go forward and is a fair shot at goal and he can take relieving marks in defence. On top of that he's a natural footballer. There's nothing manufactured about him at all. As far as I'm concerned Tim stays for as long as he wants because he will continue to improve year on year
    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

  19. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,714
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by anfo27 View Post
    You're forgetting Darcy in that equation
    Good pick up but after one game have we determined he is a key defender? As chef said, he's not there yet.
    Lets see how he goes today, GWS has a couple of players that might test him.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  20. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,714
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Trade hypotheticals

    Quote Originally Posted by Mofra View Post
    Would you do it?

    Here's one - English for Barrass. Yay or nay?
    It's close but I'm leaning towards keeping English. Finding a replacement for English given Bevo is particular with his rucking requirements might be a challenge.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •