-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
No. A ruckman like Tim only comes along once in a while. In ruckman terms he's still a baby and has a lot of growth in him. If he develops as we hope he could be on the most influential/top 5 players in the comp
He can play 80%+ time in the ruck, he can go forward and is a fair shot at goal and he can take relieving marks in defence. On top of that he's a natural footballer. There's nothing manufactured about him at all. As far as I'm concerned Tim stays for as long as he wants because he will continue to improve year on year
Great post Td. Although I would say Tim is a reliable kick for goal rather than fair.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Tom Barrass is a Perth boy, just signed a 5 year contract extension, and will be the next captain of the West Coast Eagles.
Why would he give all that up to join a pissant club like the Bulldogs.
Footscray member since 1980.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
Mofra
Would you do it?
Here's one - English for Barrass. Yay or nay?
If we had Grundy and Lobb in in another trades, yay.
The curse is dead.
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
Good pick up but after one game have we determined he is a key defender? As chef said, he's not there yet.
Lets see how he goes today, GWS has a couple of players that might test him.
His hands suggest he is already good enough at the level. Is he defender? I don't know. Thats the first time i saw him last week & watching on tv is not the same live. Maybe he turns into the intercepter defender that we need next year.
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
Flamethrower
Tom Barrass is a Perth boy, just signed a 5 year contract extension, and will be the next captain of the West Coast Eagles.
Why would he give all that up to join a pissant club like the Bulldogs.
It doesn't make any sense to me other than chasing finals. For some reason there is some speculation or perhaps just wishful thinking.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
It doesn't make any sense to me other than chasing finals. For some reason there is some speculation or perhaps just wishful thinking.
Hit the nail on the head G.
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
How did we let Lewis Young go. He has played pretty well for Carlton tonight and is not on much coin. Now here we are looking for a Big body defender. Go figure Deja Ve. Another Roughead situation
BB.
Looking forward - Naughton, Darcy and JUH. It will be the envy of everyone.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
Bumper Bulldogs
How did we let Lewis Young go. He has played pretty well for Carlton tonight and is not on much coin. Now here we are looking for a Big body defender. Go figure Deja Ve. Another Roughead situation
Been good all year.
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Melbourne getting the rub of the green umpire wise but might not be enough.
May could get an Oscar for his work tonight.
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
Bumper Bulldogs
How did we let Lewis Young go. He has played pretty well for Carlton tonight and is not on much coin. Now here we are looking for a Big body defender. Go figure Deja Ve. Another Roughead situation
Would be the perfect fit for us. Unbelievable after all the work we put into him. He always showed talent as a backman. Will never understand why we never gave him the opportunity. Now we are in the mix to see if we can get another Lewis Young.
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Big no. We are short on ruck options, and English is starting to show why he is so valuable.
What about Barrass for Dunkley?
Eagles won't release Barrass. Even in rebuilds the bookends are the first positions you build on. They have Oscar Allen returning next year who will play full forward with a few others returning so won't be down the bottom for to long.
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
"Someone" at WB thought Young was a ruckman just as they thought Dunkley was a ruckman. That same "someone"
thinks McComb, McNeill and Cordy are best 22 and Bruce (this week "managed") will be an automatic walk up after three grossly underwhelming games.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
How on earth has the Lewis Young debate ended up in this thread? At least propose a trade to get him back to the club.
Whilst I’m here, what about Sean Darcy for Tim English. Yay or nay?
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
azabob
How on earth has the Lewis Young debate ended up in this thread? At least propose a trade to get him back to the club.
Whilst I’m here, what about Sean Darcy for Tim English. Yay or nay?
i think he got mentioned as he is the type of player we need.
-
Re: Trade hypotheticals
Originally Posted by
Bullies
i think he got mentioned as he is the type of player we need.
A striker ?