Thanks Thanks:  3
Likes Likes:  11
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Offensive and Defensive review

    Richard Little - data Scientist at VIS and former Football Analyst at EFC, reviews Bulldogs Offensive and defensive





    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  2. Thanks Mofra, Scorlibo thanked for this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Overall defensive system needs a big overhaul.

    We need a new defensive assistant coach
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,329
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    Overall defensive system needs a big overhaul.

    We need a new defensive assistant coach
    I've been saying it for a while, but as much as it's about structure, it's also personnel based.

    In simple terms, our defenders can't defend.

    Duryea is very good but has maybe 1 year left, Keath looks like he should retire, Gardy has improved but not the type we can build around. I had faith in Richards, but his EF was the WORST performance/meltdown I have seen. I know VDM has copped it, but Richards was actually worse. Dale is OK at times, but we know he's an attacker. Daniel has obvious limitations.

    We really need a shake up in terms of our defensive personnel as much as we do defensive structure. For one, I'd be moving Daniel or Dale further up the ground - possibly both if we can't improve the connection between forwards and mids.
    W00F!

  9. Likes bornadog liked this post
  10. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by The Bulldogs Bite View Post
    I've been saying it for a while, but as much as it's about structure, it's also personnel based.

    In simple terms, our defenders can't defend.

    Duryea is very good but has maybe 1 year left, Keath looks like he should retire, Gardy has improved but not the type we can build around. I had faith in Richards, but his EF was the WORST performance/meltdown I have seen. I know VDM has copped it, but Richards was actually worse. Dale is OK at times, but we know he's an attacker. Daniel has obvious limitations.

    We really need a shake up in terms of our defensive personnel as much as we do defensive structure. For one, I'd be moving Daniel or Dale further up the ground - possibly both if we can't improve the connection between forwards and mids.
    We need a QUALITY A GRADE FB….Gardner is not it. He’s a 3rd defender type.
    I’m not sold on Jones until I see him play again.

    For mine, we need a FB and CHB who can beat opposition one on one.

    And we need 2 of the other 4 to be able to do it as well.

    Dale is an attacker. Get him one out with an opponent and he’d lose 8/10 times.
    I will never see #16 the same!!

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,206
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by DOG GOD View Post
    We need a QUALITY A GRADE FB….Gardner is not it. He’s a 3rd defender type.
    I’m not sold on Jones until I see him play again.

    For mine, we need a FB and CHB who can beat opposition one on one.

    And we need 2 of the other 4 to be able to do it as well.

    Dale is an attacker. Get him one out with an opponent and he’d lose 8/10 times.
    I agree on who we need, but based on the analysis by Richard, doesn't matter who plays in the backline, it is the system that is broken and we need to look at it before we get players in.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  12. Likes DOG GOD, 1eyedog liked this post
  13. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Warragul
    Posts
    9,602
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    The general consensus has long been that our defenders can't defend and are exposed one on one but this actually refutes that.

    Our one on one defensive win rate is actually really high, but we aren't forcing the opposition to kick to one on ones often enough. That surely has to be on the midfield more so than the defence.

  14. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,511
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by Axe Man View Post
    The general consensus has long been that our defenders can't defend and are exposed one on one but this actually refutes that.

    Our one on one defensive win rate is actually really high, but we aren't forcing the opposition to kick to one on ones often enough. That surely has to be on the midfield more so than the defence.
    I think our midfield is mega one paced.

    It's why I can't understand why Treloar isn't used more with Smith at times.

    Bont, Treloar, Smith is a rotation I'd have up my sleeve.

  15. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tasmania
    Posts
    5,920
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    I think our midfield is mega one paced.

    It's why I can't understand why Treloar isn't used more with Smith at times.

    Bont, Treloar, Smith is a rotation I'd have up my sleeve.
    Maybe because neither have a defensive bone in their body ?
    I will never see #16 the same!!

  16. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,511
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by DOG GOD View Post
    Maybe because neither have a defensive bone in their body ?
    They'd fit right in then!

    Treloar used to be a reasonably good contested player.

  17. Likes DOG GOD liked this post
  18. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,329
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    Treloar used to be a reasonably good contested player.
    On the eye test, it feels like he's really dropped away in this respect. If anything at the Pies he was too 'inside' and didn't use his pace enough.

    Thought his balance last year was pretty good pre-injury, but this year he hasn't seemed to effect the game in the inside OR the outside.
    W00F!

  19. Likes boydogs liked this post
  20. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,511
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Offensive and Defensive review

    Quote Originally Posted by The Bulldogs Bite View Post
    On the eye test, it feels like he's really dropped away in this respect. If anything at the Pies he was too 'inside' and didn't use his pace enough.

    Thought his balance last year was pretty good pre-injury, but this year he hasn't seemed to effect the game in the inside OR the outside.
    He dropped about ten kegs I believe probably to help with injuries.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •