-
06-12-2022, 02:36 PM
#226
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Originally Posted by
Bulldog Joe
Does McComb get the role?
Advantage for him is that he already cops the bagging on social media.
Also if he plays a defensive role he is less likely to turn the ball over.
McComb should restrict his game to handballing only.
Officially on the Bus-wagon
-
06-12-2022, 02:40 PM
#227
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Originally Posted by
F'scary
McComb should restrict his game to handballing only.
Daniel Cross to McComb's mentor confirmed
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
06-12-2022, 03:38 PM
#228
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Originally Posted by
F'scary
McComb should restrict his game to handballing only.
On training days?
-
06-12-2022, 05:08 PM
#229
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Dunkley had good defensive efforts in his game but let's not pretend he had ANY influence on stopping gun mids that regularly torched us. None. If anything, his lack of pace from the spread contributed to our weakness.
I'm looking to a change in tactics. Give SOMEONE the job to STOP the best mid. Libba did it in the GF, McLean did it pre-injury for a burst of games. SOMEBODY has to be tasked with it when needed.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 8 Likes
-
07-12-2022, 08:08 PM
#230
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Dunkley was too nice, he never really used his size to lay a massive tackle or barrel through someone. He was defensively minded yes but he never tried to really lay into a tackle like Libba will.
-
07-12-2022, 11:14 PM
#231
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Originally Posted by
Testekill
Dunkley was too nice, he never really used his size to lay a massive tackle or barrel through someone. He was defensively minded yes but he never tried to really lay into a tackle like Libba will.
Surely you jest good sir.
That fightback game he destroyed a Melbourne player in a tackle.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
chef liked this post
-
08-12-2022, 06:41 AM
#232
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Yeah nah, Dunkley hurt a few with his tackles. Hes going to be missed.
The curse is dead.
-
09-12-2022, 04:37 PM
#233
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Dunks will be missed. Hunter hardly played and when he did he was pretty rubbish.
I think if Jones & Lobb play near their best, our squad is much better balanced and overall a fair bit better. We'll be harder to stop. We'll hopefully play forwards in the fwd line and defenders in defence, and mids in the midfield. Surely we're net positive having Treloar in the middle and not on HBF, and playing a HBF on the HBF, even with Dunks out.
I agree with McLean calls. He could be a very valuable player for us as a stopper.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
09-07-2023, 07:07 PM
#234
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
I said last year, we need to assess last year and this year together for a full picture. Currently it?s:
In: Lobb, Jones, Buss, Clarke, Gallagher, Baker
In: JOD, Poulter, Pick 12, Pick 16, Croft at Pick 19 without deficit, late pick/s, rookie upgrade/s, free agent/s
With main losses of Dunkley & Hunter to date.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
20-08-2023, 05:25 PM
#235
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Not looking great now. After losing to Geelong:
Pick 27 to Freo (with 30 from last year)
Bris possibly just 17/18 & 36/37
Hunter virtually nothing
Lobb not to expectation and played VFL
Jones great
Baker fringe still
No games from our draftees
Croft is rising, but pick 8 should safe.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
09-09-2023, 09:24 PM
#236
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
So as a comparison:
Griffen & Pick 6 - for - effectively Pick 1 (Tom Boyd) - 3,000 Draft Points Worth back
Perhaps, getting Pick 4 from GCS for our first rounders:
Dunkley & Pick 10 - for - Pick 4 & 21 & 63 - 3,024 Draft Points Worth back
(Note: The second rounder from Brisbane is equal in points to the two thirds we gave them for it, so it’s a nil all draw)
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
23-09-2023, 10:02 AM
#237
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
So now we can assess the trade period, JOD & Poulter were mid season so don’t form part of the trade period before they arrived at the club. This is rating the 2022 trade period.
In:
Lobb - Picks 29 & 30
Jones - FA
Baker - DFA
None of the three draftees debuted.
Out:
Dunkley: Pick 21, 17-18 (23-24 after bids), 63 (further our after FA compo)
Hunter & our 3rd this year - Brisbane 36-37 (net LOSS of draft points)
Schache: Pick 69 (after shuffling it may have NO draft points and won’t be used, effectively delisted)
Last edited by bulldogtragic; 23-09-2023 at 08:53 PM.
Reason: Lions won
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
23-09-2023, 10:10 AM
#238
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
I was hopeful in time this would look better, but it’s not panned out well. We paid a huge price for Lobb, who may still come good. Baker is depth. Jones is a gun, but old. No kids played. We used Hunter in a way where we are now behind in draft points. Schache was a bonus, but is now effectively delisted.
So Schache nothing. Hunter took us backwards. Dunkley a couple of picks in the 20’s. Just slightly better than the picks we gave up for Lobb. It’s boarderline now Dunkley for Lobb & 63.
It’s a disaster.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 5 Likes
-
23-09-2023, 10:15 AM
#239
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
I was hopeful in time this would look better, but it?s not panned out well. We paid a huge price for Lobb, who may still come good. Baker is depth. Jones is a gun, but old. No kids played. We used Hunter in a way where we are now behind in draft points. Schache was a bonus, but is now effectively delisted.
So Schache nothing. Hunter took us backwards. Dunkley a couple of picks in the 20?s. Just slightly better than the picks we gave up for Lobb. It?s boarderline now Dunkley for Lobb & 63.
It?s a disaster.
Ouch. That for our best and fairest.
-
23-09-2023, 10:15 AM
#240
Re: Rating the 2022 Trade Period - After 7.30pm Wednesday Night
And BT, we are apparently paying part of Hunters salary.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"