-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Originally Posted by
Happy Days
If Lobb doesn’t ruck at least 35% of the game then I’m scratching my head as to why we would bother getting him.
Because English wants to ruck and not go forward.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Originally Posted by
BornInDroopSt'54
Because English wants to ruck and not go forward.
Hmmm.
I dunno. It's like he rucked MORE this game than he used to when we didn't have an actual 2nd ruck option. That doesn't make sense.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Originally Posted by
Virgin-Dog
If he's a team player, he'll ruck when required. We shouldn't bow to his demands when we've just traded him in. It should be made clear he's the least "forward" of all the forwards. I was disappointed how little he rucked, really don't want to see Naughton rucking at all unless there's a mismatch (i.e. no true ruckman available for the opposition, so he can manhandle them)
He made it clear prior to signing and he always has. He prefers to play forward.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Me whenever the club issues a 'Medical Room' Update ...
BORDERLINE FLYING
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 4 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Dunkley or Jong to pinch hit in the ruck this week
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Originally Posted by
JanLorMill
Dunkley or Jong to pinch hit in the ruck this week
You forgot Cordy and Young.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Out - Lobb - inj, Jones - inj, Hannan, JJ
In - Khamis, Cleary, Maclean, West (JJ as sub) with Bruce to be relief ruck when not in backline or resting
Daniel under scrutiny too
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Originally Posted by
josie
Out - Lobb - inj, Jones - inj, Hannan, JJ
In - Khamis, Cleary, Maclean, West (JJ as sub) with Bruce to be relief ruck when not in backline or resting
Daniel under scrutiny too
I bet Khamis does the second ruck role
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Would McComb come into calculations? I know he has plenty of doubters but he does work his arse off.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
20-03-2023, 05:41 PM
#100
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Originally Posted by
bornadog
I bet Khamis does the second ruck role
If we are going to ruck English 95% again then 5% to a very slight Darcy isn't going to hurt him
-
20-03-2023, 05:48 PM
#101
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
St Kilda played Marshall as their sole ruck on the weekend so Buku or Darcy chopping English out against whoever relieves Marshall (Cordy?) shouldn't be an issue at least.
-
20-03-2023, 05:53 PM
#102
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Originally Posted by
josie
Out - Lobb - inj, Jones - inj, Hannan, JJ
In - Khamis, Cleary, Maclean, West (JJ as sub) with Bruce to be relief ruck when not in backline or resting
Daniel under scrutiny too
If Jones plays we could use Bruce in that role.
-
20-03-2023, 06:04 PM
#103
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
For those who watched the VFL practice match against Casey Demons, did anyone put their hand up for a selection recall?
-
20-03-2023, 06:11 PM
#104
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Originally Posted by
josie
You forgot Cordy and Young.
Not Young. Wouldn't want to force him out of the club. I've got a good feeling about him.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 4 Likes
-
20-03-2023, 06:12 PM
#105
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 2 V St Kilda
Lobb may well have been used in a way to manage his ankle during the game against the Dees
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes