Thanks Thanks:  6
Likes Likes:  67
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 94
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Quote Originally Posted by Happy Days View Post
    I’ve always thought that Lobb is a better ruck than forward (and that he’s given credit for generally) so I’m for this. Tim is a superstar but solo rucking is way too taxing to be viable, especially when we have capable support in great supply.
    Tim was out of gas by the end of the year and given he's had an interrupted pre-season, which could be due to his heavy load in 2023 we need to ensure he is capable of playing the entire season at an extremely high level, which we know he is capable of. Having Rory share the load can only benefit us.

  2. Likes Sedat liked this post
  3. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,089
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Quote Originally Posted by MrMahatma View Post
    We?re moving the land of giants to the centre bounce. Lobb, English and Darcy all on the ball.
    What could possibly be wrong with that?
    Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured

  4. #63
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,743
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    Tim was out of gas by the end of the year and given he's had an interrupted pre-season, which could be due to his heavy load in 2023 we need to ensure he is capable of playing the entire season at an extremely high level, which we know he is capable of. Having Rory share the load can only benefit us.
    He certainly looked to be tiring in that last past of the season so I agree having Lobb increase his ruck work in most of the games should be a positive for the club and the players. A few more spells on the bench or even up forward should strike a a better balance.

    We've got a very good match day ruck combination, tweaking the balance to utilise their talents is the key.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  5. #64
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    1,469
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Happy to cut Lobb some slack on last year as well. By all accounts he should not have played the first part of last year and only made his ankle worse coming back to soon after finally having the op. Has a good tank as well and can play up the ground. He is also one who can kick a goal.

  6. #65
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,183
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    We've got a very good match day ruck combination, tweaking the balance to utilise their talents is the key.
    Better late than never. If we use these two correctly all season (not just in R24), we have a couple of studs in the team that will cause all sorts of problems for the opposition wherever they are deployed.
    "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

  7. #66
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    I still can't fathom how or why we recruit Lobb to play second ruck/forward, only to basically not play him as a second ruck.

    Maybe I am underselling Lobb's injury / conditioning and he simply wasn't able to do it as originally planned.
    W00F!

  8. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,262
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Bulldogs Bite View Post
    I still can't fathom how or why we recruit Lobb to play second ruck/forward, only to basically not play him as a second ruck.

    Maybe I am underselling Lobb's injury / conditioning and he simply wasn't able to do it as originally planned.
    But, he did play second ruck, however, not for long stints, which is what I think you are alluding too.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  9. #68
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    7
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Definitely up for Lobb spending more time in there in 2024. Keep Tim fresher by doing a 60-40 or 70-30 split with Lobb.

  10. Likes hujsh, EasternWest liked this post
  11. #69
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    475
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Ideally I'd prefer to see Darcy come on in leaps and bounds and take Lobbs role off him

  12. #70
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,786
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Darcy needs to of us on staying on the paddock... and he's probably going to be a victim of his own flexibility this year.
    I suspect next year he really challenges Lobb given he will still probably be a little underweight for significant ruck duties at AFL level.
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

  13. #71
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,743
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Bulldogs Bite View Post
    I still can't fathom how or why we recruit Lobb to play second ruck/forward, only to basically not play him as a second ruck.

    Maybe I am underselling Lobb's injury / conditioning and he simply wasn't able to do it as originally planned.
    Lobb's injury late in the preseason really unraveled the start of his season. I'm optimistic of what he might bring us this year.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  14. #72
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Posts
    40
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Ankles and Ruckman, are like Half back flankers and hammy's. You cannot expect optimal performance if not 100%. The difference being that Ruckman can still play with a dodgy ankle at a reduced output. Looking forward to seeing what Lobb can bring, when at 100%

  15. #73
    Join Date
    Nov 2023
    Posts
    21
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    Tim was out of gas by the end of the year and given he's had an interrupted pre-season, which could be due to his heavy load in 2023 we need to ensure he is capable of playing the entire season at an extremely high level, which we know he is capable of. Having Rory share the load can only benefit us.
    Agree with this. Tim solo rucking needs to be considered across the season, not just as a within game workload issue.

    Possibly a multi-year career consideration too. Probably gets an extra 1-2 years out of himself with ruck support and spending more time just floating a kick behind the play like Gawn does. Offsets the slight salary difference to stay too.

  16. Likes hujsh liked this post
  17. #74
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,165
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Lobb played 98% TOG in 2022 as Fremantle's second if not major target, and kicked 36 goals.

    As our third forward target in 2023 with a bit of ruck relief he missed a few games due to form but still kicked 24 goals at 85% TOG. His disposals were down 0.8 a game, marks 1.2 a game, goals 0.5 a game on average. Probably something you'd see if someone went from second/ first banana to third.

    Everyone would admit he disappointed, but I reckon by how much he did should be up for debate. Adapting to a new system and having his role changed from the year prior drastically might have had a justifiable impact on his output.
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  18. #75
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    127
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Controversial Opinion: We will/would be BETTER with LOBB in the ruck and English up forward in 2023.

    Tim should still be our main ruck, but giving him a bit more of a rest from the ruck makes a lot of sense. He can be effective anywhere, Lobb can step in if Tim is getting physically monstered. Down the line I'd love to see an English/Darcy ruck/forward duo rather than Tim playing almost entirely ruck.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •