-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
The Bulldogs Bite
Wouldn't be surprised to see us bring Vandermeer in and move Scott to HB.
What I took from the presser is if Vandermeer plays it is on the HB flank.
Half me wants this to happen and watch jeemaks head explode. Naughton, Libba and VDM all doing silly little things... it Darwin's humidity of all places.
In fact, jee, want to watch the game at the pub?
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
It's Bevo. I'm half expecting Josh Bruce to get named
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
The Bulldogs Bite
Wouldn't be surprised to see us bring Vandermeer in and move Scott to HB.
That would be bad IMO. Scott has kicked more goals in the last 3 weeks than Vanders has in the last 3 years (don't fact check me on that it sounds good so I said it!)
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
hujsh
That would be bad IMO. Scott has kicked more goals in the last 3 weeks than Vanders has in the last 3 years (don't fact check me on that it sounds good so I said it!)
I'll hit you up with facts not for the last 3 weeks but for the last 3 years LVM 19 goals. AS 25 goals.
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
Hotdog60
I'll hit you up with facts not for the last 3 weeks but for the last 3 years LVM 19 goals. AS 25 goals.
Damn You!
Looking at things properly Scott kicked 6 goals in the last 3 weeks and Vanders kicked 4 in 2022 and 6 in 21. So while an exaggeration I feel the spirit of my statement holds true.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Does Cleary for JJ deprive us for pace too much? I think he is the next best but does someone else fit the side better?
I'd go
In: Cleary, VDM/McNeil (other one as sub)
Out: JJ, JOD
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
hujsh
Damn You!
Looking at things properly Scott kicked 6 goals in the last 3 weeks and Vanders kicked 4 in 2022 and 6 in 21. So while an exaggeration I feel the spirit of my statement holds true.
I wouldn't be playing LVM forward of the ball again if he can't make it across the HB then we should look to use his list spot for someone else.
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
Rocco Jones
Does Cleary for JJ deprive us for pace too much? I think he is the next best but does someone else fit the side better?
I'd go
In: Cleary, VDM/McNeil (other one as sub)
Out: JJ, JOD
I think Cleary is competing for a spot with the likes of Williams, Dale, and Richards and not a JJ,Daniel type.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
bornadog
I think Cleary is competing for a spot with the likes of Williams, Dale, and Richards and not a JJ,Daniel type.
I meant Cleary in can we then replace JJ down the chain? And can we be too fixated on finding a similar type when they really aren’t up to?
I don’t think we will see Daniel based at HBF. A bit of an easy target for the opposition. I’ve really liked his flexibility. I think good coaches/structures maximise their players strengths and hide their weaknesses. Feel we are doing that with Daniel lately.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
bornadog
I think Cleary is competing for a spot with the likes of Williams, Dale, and Richards and not a JJ,Daniel type.
I don't follow this at all. In what way are JJ and Daniel similar that Dale and Richards are not (nevermind Williams being on the wing)?
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
Rocco Jones
I meant Cleary in can we then replace JJ down the chain? And can we be too fixated on finding a similar type when they really aren’t up to?
I don’t think we will see Daniel based at HBF. A bit of an easy target for the opposition. I’ve really liked his flexibility. I think good coaches/structures maximise their players strengths and hide their weaknesses. Feel we are doing that with Daniel lately.
Funnily this whole sentence is JJ in a nutshell when he first was moved from the HB line.
I agree Clearly should be the natural JJ replacement
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Looking at the VFL stats VDM has done nothing to warrant selection - 10 possessions in each of his last 2 VFL games whilst Cleary has had 20 and 24. Cleary or Crozier before VDM imo.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
azabob
Funnily this whole sentence is JJ in a nutshell when he first was moved from the HB line.
I agree Clearly should be the natural JJ replacement
I don't think JJ was being hidden as much as we needed someone with some zip up front.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Originally Posted by
westbulldog
Looking at the VFL stats VDM has done nothing to warrant selection - 10 possessions in each of his last 2 VFL games whilst Cleary has had 20 and 24. Cleary or Crozier before VDM imo.
The one thing that VDM has that is transferrable from the twos to the ones versus the others is pace. Possession are great but whether they translate or otherwise is a different story.
Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.
-
Re: Always Right Match Committee Round 11 v Suns
Crozier and Cleary for JJ and McNeil. Expect crozier to be the sub