-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
azabob
I couldn't engage because I don't know what the Rorshack Test was and looking up the definition confused me even more.
Ink blot test. Where you just say whatever you see. People see different things looking at same ink blot. Despite it being the same. Was used as a personality test back in the day.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
mjp liked this post
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
mjp
- I have shingles right now and it is kicking my butt pretty bad.
Hopefully a quick recovery. My wife had it many years ago, and wasn't pleasant for her.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
mjp liked this post
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
I got shingles after my third COVID Vaccine, my wife got it just after her second COVID Vaccine. Don't know if it was just a coincidence but that is what happened.
Super painful and knocked us both for six. All the best for a speedy recovery.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
mjp liked this post
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
May be there's nothing wrong with the plan (what ever that is) but the cattle to implement it. If player A is given a task and he is either too slow, not strong enough or not mentally capable. So give it player B and its not much different so the hands get tied.
When we are allowed to play our way we can be quite brutal but if the screws are applied or we get given a taste of our own medicine we don't have the speed and mongrel to stop it.
Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Get well soon MJP.
Is it the players conditioning that can be incorporated into the close losses?
We use ALOT of petrol tickets to get those 20 point leads. A lot of running, a lot of inside 50’s for in most part, little result on the scoreboard. Many many times I e watched games and by the 10 min mark of the 3rd we look out on our feet. Are we just not fit enough ? Who is the conditioning coach and how long has he been at the dogs ?
I’m not saying this is THE reason. I also think our lack of leadership on field, lack of player focus, the coaches unable to generate a plan B etc etc are also in the mix.
I will never see #16 the same!!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
Hotdog60
May be there's nothing wrong with the plan (what ever that is) but the cattle to implement it. If player A is given a task and he is either too slow, not strong enough or not mentally capable. So give it player B and its not much different so the hands get tied.
When we are allowed to play our way we can be quite brutal but if the screws are applied or we get given a taste of our own medicine we don't have the speed and mongrel to stop it.
Then it’s the wrong plan. Simple as that.
Bevo has been on record saying he will use what is available to him and build a style that suits the personnel.
Time and Tide Waits For No Man
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
No dilemma if we said to Bevo; let?s talk about your contract at the end of 2023. We are a results based organisation and we believe you will get us to top 4 in 2023 so let?s talk then. There?s no rush.
But nooo. The one older brother had to go and screw it all up.
Two years salary on the line, straight out of the soft cap. We signed BMac early and it cost us. We seemingly want to sign everyone early and then wonder why if best laid plans fail we have/might have to pay out big money for nothing. Did we learn nothing from paying out BMac?
Would Bevo be re-signed right now? Would the club have had clandestine conversations with others just in case we didn?t by now?
Coach payouts are generally capped at 6 months, regardless of the time left on their contract.
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
Mantis
For 45min we were statues and it was unacceptable. I can deal with the other losses, but yesterday hit different.
Maybe it hit different because we had the most obvious lever to pull all season (tag Newcombe) and we did it half an hour late, and with the wrong player.
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
Mofra
Coach payouts are generally capped at 6 months, regardless of the time left on their contract.
Are you sure? I read that Simpsons payout at Eagles would be huge and that is why he is being kept on? Gotta pay for those hungry Jacks Franchises
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Are you sure? I read that Simpsons payout at Eagles would be huge and that is why he is being kept on? Gotta pay for those hungry Jacks Franchises
The six month clause is likely linked to afl assistance packages.
Eagles can afford to pay out Simpson, but they will go over the soft cap and get taxed.
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
Mofra
Coach payouts are generally capped at 6 months, regardless of the time left on their contract.
I thought the six month rule is conditional. In that you need to be a basket case club the AFEL is funding because they can’t turn a profit - hence why Saints/Ratten was six months. The AFEL don’t want to be in effect paying these huge coach pay outs. Since we turn a profit, it wouldn’t apply.
I found this extract:
The new AFL rule stipulates that every contract exceeding $215,000 struck with coaches and staff at debt-ridden and AFL-assisted clubs must be approved by Auld and include a settlement of no more than six months.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 0 Likes
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
DOG GOD
Get well soon MJP.
Is it the players conditioning that can be incorporated into the close losses?
We use ALOT of petrol tickets to get those 20 point leads. A lot of running, a lot of inside 50’s for in most part, little result on the scoreboard. Many many times I e watched games and by the 10 min mark of the 3rd we look out on our feet. Are we just not fit enough ? Who is the conditioning coach and how long has he been at the dogs ?
I’m not saying this is THE reason. I also think our lack of leadership on field, lack of player focus, the coaches unable to generate a plan B etc etc are also in the mix.
Matt Inness? He's probably been there 5 years.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Originally Posted by
HOSE B ROMERO
Matt Inness? He's probably been there 5 years.
Chris Bell as well.
-
Re: Everyone is RIGHT.
Matt Innes has been at the club for 9 years and 10 months.
He was VFL Strength and Conditioning coach for one year.
He was High Performance Coach for another year.
For the last 8 Years he has been the Head of Sport Science and Physical Performance.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes