Thanks Thanks:  27
Likes Likes:  98
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 63
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    17,698
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    I believe it is called The Whatever It takes Academy
    Set up to still not to win a final for another number of years
    "Footscray people are incredible people; so humble. I'm just so happy - ecstatic"

  2. Likes hujsh, bornadog, jeemak liked this post
  3. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,565
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    I like that we have drafted 5 kids. It gives a nice fill up to the list with some youth. Hoping that they can all be 100+ game players.

  4. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,089
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by bornadog View Post
    I believe it is called The Whatever It takes Academy
    It has been more of "The What are we Doing Academy"
    Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,954
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog Joe View Post
    It has been more of "The What are we Doing Academy"
    So what they do now is let other teams do the work then if a player is any good take them under pick 40.
    It’s smart, wrong but smart.
    I’m surprised they didn’t take Dear they stoop that low.
    Bring back the biff

  6. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,763
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by ledge View Post
    I am always amazed how commentary is about who won the draft 2 minutes after it?s done .
    How can you possibly know until years down the track ?
    We won as far as I can see.

    It?s a little hard to see though as my view is obscured by the next 3 flags we?ve pretty much already got wrapped up.

  7. Likes Bulldog4life liked this post
  8. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,765
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by ledge View Post
    So what they do now is let other teams do the work then if a player is any good take them under pick 40.
    It’s smart, wrong but smart.
    I’m surprised they didn’t take Dear they stoop that low.
    Is it though? No one else rated him in the top 40 (at least with the picks they had). If they had someone they think is better and didn't get them then it's not smart, it's kinda dumb.

    I hope he comes back in a couple years. We can offer pick 40

  9. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,954
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    Is it though? No one else rated him in the top 40 (at least with the picks they had). If they had someone they think is better and didn't get them then it's not smart, it's kinda dumb.

    I hope he comes back in a couple years. We can offer pick 40
    I did say If they are any good . But yes it can work against you if no one else did it before 40 obviously 38 was rated above him , so he either went at the right pick or they paid overs . In saying that we were going to take him at 45 so 39 isn’t to far off the mark. He was with in the range of 40 to 45
    Bring back the biff

  10. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,765
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by ledge View Post
    I did say If they are any good . But yes it can work against you if no one else did it before 40 obviously 38 was rated above him , so he either went at the right pick or they paid overs . In saying that we were going to take him at 45 so 39 isn’t to far off the mark. He was with in the range of 40 to 45
    But it's still not smart. It's just baseline. If you think a player is the 39th best or better you take them with pick 39 unless you're being charitable or have concerns they'll leave and you'll waste your investment.

  11. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,763
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by hujsh View Post
    Is it though? No one else rated him in the top 40 (at least with the picks they had). If they had someone they think is better and didn't get them then it's not smart, it's kinda dumb.

    I hope he comes back in a couple years. We can offer pick 40
    Surely bidding on a player can only be “smart” if you make the club with rights to him pay overs. If you take an NGA in the sub-40 range, it‘s just called “drafting” isn’t it? Pick a player you like at that pick.

  12. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    10,765
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by MrMahatma View Post
    Surely bidding on a player can only be “smart” if you make the club with rights to him pay overs. If you take an NGA in the sub-40 range, it‘s just called “drafting” isn’t it? Pick a player you like at that pick.
    Yep, unless of course the club with rights calls your bluff


  13. Likes Sedat, bulldogtragic, macca, jeemak liked this post
  14. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,954
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by MrMahatma View Post
    Surely bidding on a player can only be “smart” if you make the club with rights to him pay overs. If you take an NGA in the sub-40 range, it‘s just called “drafting” isn’t it? Pick a player you like at that pick.
    It’s like their pick ten the media drool over it, what a great get etc . Fact is no other club wanted him under pick 10 so he is a pick 10 at best.
    So did Essendon pick Lual just to piss us off ? Not a smart way to do business .
    Bring back the biff

  15. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,555
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by ledge View Post
    It’s like their pick ten the media drool over it, what a great get etc . Fact is no other club wanted him under pick 10 so he is a pick 10 at best.
    So did Essendon pick Lual just to piss us off ? Not a smart way to do business .
    Can you find a Lual reaction video?

  16. #43
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    6,817
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by Grantysghost View Post
    Can you find a Lual reaction video?
    He said prior to the draft he really wanted to come to us. Being 1 pick away he surely was a little flat about missing out. That's how essendon roll though. They don't really care what happens to their players.
    Last edited by bulldogsthru&thru; 23-11-2023 at 10:32 PM.

  17. #44
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,555
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogsthru&thru View Post
    He said prior to the draft he really wanted to come to us. Being 1 pick away he surely was a little flat about missing out. That's how essendon role though. They don't really care what happens to their players.
    We would have called them too and pleaded the case.

  18. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,739
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Rating the 2023 Overall List Management Period

    Quote Originally Posted by bulldogsthru&thru View Post
    He said prior to the draft he really wanted to come to us. Being 1 pick away he surely was a little flat about missing out. That's how essendon roll though. They don't really care what happens to their players.
    As I've previously mentioned I didn't mind if a club was genuinely into Lual and picked him from pick 25 to perhaps as late as 35 but after that they really need to have a rethink and assess if they could offer him as much support and a chance for success on and off the field as we would have. Essendon obviously rated him but the right thing would have been for them to let him slide though.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •