Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  14
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,304
    Post Thanks / Like

    How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    There have been lots of really good to great tall forwards this century.

    Earlier on, there was Brown and Lloyd, followed by Saint Riewoldt and Buddy followed by Tiger Riewoldt and some say Lynch. Not to forget my favourite - Kennedy at the Eagles. I am sure I've missed some key names.

    So after 350 games, how do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    And what are your top five power forwards in order this century so far?
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  2. Likes Yankee Hotel Foxtrot liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,737
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    I don't rate his as high when pitted against some of the better key forwards but for durability and effort he's been phenomenal.
    He could go another season.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,304
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Quote Originally Posted by GVGjr View Post
    I don't rate his as high when pitted against some of the better key forwards but for durability and effort he's been phenomenal.
    He could go another season.
    Fair enough, I have never been a great fan of Hawkins.

    So who are your top five in order this century?
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,954
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Rated on longevity and consistency he is up there for sure.
    As an honest player as well, which I rate highly.
    He deserves the accolades, at the beginning being a manchild and so much bigger than kids he played with he just bullied his way but I applaud him for not falling away when he found himself against the same build and bigger, he didnt give up like a lot of man child’s he worked his arse off to still make it,
    Bring back the biff

  6. Likes Dry Rot liked this post
  7. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,304
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Quote Originally Posted by ledge View Post
    Rated on longevity and consistency he is up there for sure.
    As an honest player as well, which I rate highly.
    He deserves the accolades, at the beginning being a manchild and so much bigger than kids he played with he just bullied his way but I applaud him for not falling away when he found himself against the same build and bigger, he didnt give up like a lot of man child’s he worked his arse off to still make it,
    But how does he rate against your top 5? Who are they?
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,954
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry Rot View Post
    But how does he rate against your top 5? Who are they?
    He would probably be number 2 behind Franklin, if we go on the last 15 years. It’s hard to put them in order but Kennedy and Reiwoldt would be in it as well.
    Bring back the biff

  9. Likes Dry Rot liked this post
  10. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,304
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    My top three would be Brown, Franklin and Kennedy.

    With the next two, I would have the two Riewoldts and Lloyd in the mix.

    All that clearly leaves Hawkins out of my top five.
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,165
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    He plays for Geelong so that immediately makes him amazing, but he's only been the Coleman medalist once in 17 years.

    His acolytes will say he gives away so many goals because of his generosity, and that's actually good, so how do you define his role and his output?

    He's never going to be Buddy, he's never going to be Fev who was a FF in a shit team a lot of the time. He won't be Lloyd, nor will he be Gehrig or Kennedy, because they kicked more in individual seasons and won the title.

    But he straightens them up (ironically on a ground that doesn't require play to be straightened) and he formed a part of three premiership teams which is more than all of the others outside of Roughead who played a similar role.

    So he's top few, that should be enough.
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Inside the mind of Brian Lake
    Posts
    6,304
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Agreed, all good points. I don't think Hawkins is one of the best.

    Shit, I'd forgotten about Fev who did so well in such a shit team.

    And Gehrig.

    There's allegedly a very funny story about Fraser drunk as a skunk at a bar next to the daughter of a Victorian police detective. Do you know that story?

    Great FF.
    The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,817
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Not in my top 5 I actually probably have Pav in front of him for sixth place although that's a coin toss.

    5. Richo (athletic, entertaining and an elite contested mark).
    4. Jonathon Brown (brave, tough and stood up again and again when they needed him)
    3. Nick Riewoldt (modern day Royce Hart, mobile, massive tank and the best mark in this group).
    2. Lloyd (Brilliant performer good at everything, last of the traditionalists).
    1. Buddy. Good at everything as well as things we didn't think were possible.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  14. Likes DOG GOD liked this post
  15. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,165
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dry Rot View Post
    Agreed, all good points. I don't think Hawkins is one of the best.

    Shit, I'd forgotten about Fev who did so well in such a shit team.

    And Gehrig.

    There's allegedly a very funny story about Fraser drunk as a skunk at a bar next to the daughter of a Victorian police detective. Do you know that story?

    Great FF.
    I know a story that's almost exactly the same as that but it isn't funny.
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  16. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,165
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    Not in my top 5 I actually probably have Pav in front of him for sixth place although that's a coin toss.

    5. Richo
    4. Jonathon Brown
    3. Nick Riewoldt
    2. Lloyd
    1. Buddy
    Brown is a charlatan of a footballer......well, he's not but I think he's overrated.

    I used to have friends who said he was better than Chris Grant. As I said, used to have friends.......
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  17. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,817
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Quote Originally Posted by jeemak View Post
    Brown is a charlatan of a footballer......well, he's not but I think he's overrated.

    I used to have friends who said he was better than Chris Grant. As I said, used to have friends.......
    Yeah I get it he's a bit like Hawkins but a bit better. I think Brown was a great on field leader and made them walk taller. As a team mate you just knew that he was prepared to die for you and I kinda dig that.

    Grant was a better footballer no doubt.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

  18. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    19,165
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    Quote Originally Posted by 1eyedog View Post
    Yeah I get it he's a bit like Hawkins but a bit better.
    Good to have you back and agreeing with me mate.
    Nobody's looking for a puppeteer in today's wintry economic climate.

  19. Likes 1eyedog liked this post
  20. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,817
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: How do you rate Tom Hawkins against his peers this century?

    If Grant didn't go back surely has to be top 3.
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •