Re: The NAB cup rules - Innovative or just stupid
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
One thing-Has an umpire other than a field umpire made a decision on general play yet?
That one where Jordy got pinged for overstepping was a guess by a field umpire at least 20 metres from the play. Surely the goal umpire is in a better possie to adjudicate on a decision like that?
One decision by a boundary umpire. But was over ruled the field umpire (fearing his credibility), but then another field umpire over ruled him to agree with the boundary. Too many chiefs......
Overall, my memo to the AFL is LEAVE THE F***ING GAME ALONE.
It survived over 100 years without their stupid overhaul of stupid rule changes and doesn't need to stuff up what we all know is great with gimics. The focus should be the level of play of the teams, not how many umpires there are, what they do or rules changes they can interpret. ****s me to tears the fact they keep over stepping their role. The AFL are the games administrators, there to ensure survival of the league, not there to ruin the game from the inside.
I could keep going on but i wont.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023