Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 31
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,647
    Post Thanks / Like

    With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Western Bulldogs gun half-forward Shaun Higgins doubts the club will chase out-of-favour Sydney spearhead Barry Hall. The Bulldogs are believed to be the only club open to trading for Hall.

    But Higgins, 21, felt the Dogs' 88-point demolition of Hawthorn, which sets up a "massive" match against Collingwood on Friday night, would help close the door on any speculation.

    He said the team's precision kicking and selflessness in attack was more important than having a big-name spearhead.

    "Outside of the club, there's a lot of big talk that we need a tall forward, but we don't believe that at all," Higgins said.

    "Our forward line is working well and the way that we use the footy. If we can keep doing that, there is no need for the tall forward.

    "And we are working well as a forward group, so we are not worried about getting a big forward at all."

    Hall's future is unclear after he suggested last week he had considered retiring or switching clubs on the back of his latest suspension.

    Showing a more balanced forward approach, the Dogs scored from 38 of their 52 inside-50s at Etihad Stadium on Saturday night, demoralising Hawthorn's premiership defence.

    Coming into the round, the Dogs had the second-best attack in the competition and they underlined that with 10 goalkickers.

    In-form midfielder Adam Cooney said yesterday the 13-goal first half was special.

    "It's probably the best first half I've been involved in since I've been at the club," he said.

    But the focus at Whitten Oval has quickly turned to Collingwood and a battle that could determine which side finishes in third place behind St Kilda and Geelong.

    "It's a massive game for us next week against Collingwood to try to secure a top-four spot. Collingwood is knocking on the door behind us," Higgins said.

    "We will worry about Geelong and St Kilda later in the year.

    "We have got to make sure we get the recovery right this week because we have got a short week coming up and Collingwood, over the last month, has played some really good footy.

    "We have got to do our homework on them."

    Higgins, who is out of contract at the end of the season and among Gold Coast's most wanted, said the players took a lot of confidence out of the win against the Hawks.

    "Obviously considering what they were able to do last year -- and they have got a similar list -- we were expecting a tough game," he said.

    "They have been down the past few weeks. We knew they would come out strong, so to put on the first quarter (nine goals to nil) that we did was pleasing."

    He praised the team's kicking efficiency and finishing skills, but he said its tackling and toughness was even more important to its success.

    Higgins said the work on pressure tactics in the past few years, and particularly in the pre-season, was paying off.

    "We have come from a long way back in terms of defensive skills in the last few years," he said.

    "We put a big emphasis on it in the pre-season.

    "It's been a massive jump. That's what wins you games these days.

    "Hawthorn has obviously built its game on hardness around the footy and stoppages in the last few years.

    "But we are right up there now with hardball gets and clearances, which is pleasing."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    sydenham
    Posts
    12,859
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    In all that Higgins says i still think a big forward is another great option we could have and another thing the opposition would be dumbfounded with.

    Besides that the media would shut up about it!

    I wouldnt mind Hall at the club if the head is right.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Moe's Tavern
    Posts
    2,880
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    I worry about his versatility.

    What if plan A "Kick it to Barry Hall" doesn't work?

    Do we leave him there?, bench him?, put him into defense?


    Our game is working so well because we have so many players that can play just about anywhere. Not sure Barry would really fit in with that strategy.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,647
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyberdoggie View Post
    I worry about his versatility.

    What if plan A "Kick it to Barry Hall" doesn't work?

    Do we leave him there?, bench him?, put him into defense?

    Our game is working so well because we have so many players that can play just about anywhere. Not sure Barry would really fit in with that strategy.
    I think it says a fair bit about us that arguably our 2 most creative forwards (Gia & Murf) were not in our forward line on Saturday night and we were still able to have 38 shots on goal. Of course this was helped by the midfield dominance, but it is still a very good result.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Look at the Geelong vs St Kilda game in the dying seconds. What a luxury to be able to kick the ball long and have Gardiner mark it. Geelong were too busy worrying about Kosi & Riewoldt. Its hard to be precise with your skills when you are under that much pressure, hence why the long kick to a pack situation is needed from time to time. The ball travels faster than anyone can run.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,647
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    ^^^^

    Good point Desi.

    I was just thinking about this at lunch-time when reading about the Geel v St.K game. We will no doubt find ourselves in a similar position at some point this season and it will be interesting to see how we go about scoring the winning goal when our running players are out on their feet.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    939
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Desipura View Post
    Look at the Geelong vs St Kilda game in the dying seconds. What a luxury to be able to kick the ball long and have Gardiner mark it. Geelong were too busy worrying about Kosi & Riewoldt. Its hard to be precise with your skills when you are under that much pressure, hence why the long kick to a pack situation is needed from time to time. The ball travels faster than anyone can run.
    Gardner is a ruckman, not a forward. And yes from time to time you need a big bloke who can take the mark from a hoof to no-one in particular. For one thing Griffen's turnover stats kicking into the forward 50 would look better as we could say his 100 metre (50 up and 50 down) kicks were aimed at the tall forwards. But really, when you look at it, only Geelong has score more than us (10 points more than us at that). St Kilda, Hawthorn, Brisbane, Essendon all have two tall forwards and they have scored less than us. Scoring is not and hasn't been a problem for nearly 2 seasons. As Higgins said a strong defense is what decides the winners and the losers theses days. And i hope we keep Higgins, but he'll be offered a fat wad of cash, club captaincy..to play in a losing side.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Mulligan's Boogie-board
    Posts
    13,761
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    I was just thinking about this at lunch-time when reading about the Geel v St.K game. We will no doubt find ourselves in a similar position at some point this season and it will be interesting to see how we go about scoring the winning goal when our running players are out on their feet.
    Lake mark, feigns dodgy hammy, Minson to kick it?

    I still think players with X factor are made for these moments - he's no monster but Hill will probably do something like this one game.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    939
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    ^^^^

    Good point Desi.

    I was just thinking about this at lunch-time when reading about the Geel v St.K game. We will no doubt find ourselves in a similar position at some point this season and it will be interesting to see how we go about scoring the winning goal when our running players are out on their feet.
    I'm not concerned about being run off our feet. Our last quarters are the best in the league. Fitness in the dying stages won't be a problem.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Stefcep View Post
    Gardner is a ruckman, not a forward. And yes from time to time you need a big bloke who can take the mark from a hoof to no-one in particular. For one thing Griffen's turnover stats kicking into the forward 50 would look better as we could say his 100 metre (50 up and 50 down) kicks were aimed at the tall forwards. But really, when you look at it, only Geelong has score more than us (10 points more than us at that). St Kilda, Hawthorn, Brisbane, Essendon all have two tall forwards and they have scored less than us. Scoring is not and hasn't been a problem for nearly 2 seasons. As Higgins said a strong defense is what decides the winners and the losers theses days. And i hope we keep Higgins, but he'll be offered a fat wad of cash, club captaincy..to play in a losing side.
    No he is not but having someone like Barry in the forward line allows Will to push forward and fly for a mark in a pack sitiation with less attention.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Stefcep View Post
    I'm not concerned about being run off our feet. Our last quarters are the best in the league. Fitness in the dying stages won't be a problem.

    Finals are played after a long season and they are generally more physical and much faster than a home and away game. That has to take its toll on the players regardless of how fit they are.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    I was looking forward to reading.

    "A contract is there, and i will be signing it soon."

    Come on Higgo!!!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    939
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Desipura View Post
    No he is not but having someone like Barry in the forward line allows Will to push forward and fly for a mark in a pack sitiation with less attention.
    fair enough, but i still don't think scoring is our major concern. We've scored more than St Kilda, who have two tall forwards, but we've conceded 400 points more than they have. I think its the lack of a another key position backman

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    5,361
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Desipura View Post
    Finals are played after a long season and they are generally more physical and much faster than a home and away game. That has to take its toll on the players regardless of how fit they are.
    I'd rather we play some tougher games closer to finals, rather than easy games against poor opposition

    Going into the finals matches seasoned will better prepare us for the tough finals games, and its better to make mistakes in the home and away season ie loose to Geelong/St Kilda both again, than loose to them in the finals

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Behind the goals, Geelong Rd end
    Posts
    6,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: With Dogs so menacing, who needs Barry Hall?

    Quote Originally Posted by Stefcep View Post
    fair enough, but i still don't think scoring is our major concern. We've scored more than St Kilda, who have two tall forwards, but we've conceded 400 points more than they have. I think its the lack of a another key position backman
    What CHF has towelled us up?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •