Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    3,509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    As I sit back and mull over the 2009 season, I wonder what did St. Kilda do that enabled them to take that elusive next step compared to the Bulldogs this year.

    If you remember back to 2008, the Saints snuck into the double chance by flogging Essendon by 108 points effectively stealing fourth from Adelaide by 0.82%. Whereas the Bulldogs knew they would finish third and play Hawthorn by round18.

    In the qualifying finals both the Saints and Bulldogs got flogged (Saints by 58 points against Geelong, and the Bulldogs by 51 points by Hawthorn)

    The semi finals were also very similar results; the Bulldogs beat Sydney by 37points, whilst the Saints beat Collingwood by 34 points.

    Both teams then played in the Preliminary finals … (Saints lost to Hawthorn by 54 points, and Dogs lost to Geelong by 29 points).

    A very similar finals campaign …


    The trade period saw St. Kilda take Farren Ray and pick #48 from us in return for pick #31. The Saints also picked up Tom Lynch (pick #13), Rhys Stanley (pick #47), Nicholas Heyne (pick #48), Alistair Smith (pick #62), Paul Cahill (pick # 73), and Colm Beagley (pick #83) … the only rookie draft of any note for the Saints was Zac Dawson.

    Compared to The Bulldogs who picked up Ayce Cordy (pick #14 F/S), Jordan Roughhead (pick #31) and Liam Jones (pick #32) … the only rookie draft of any note for the Dogs was Liam Picken.


    Now except for Farren Ray, who has bolstered St. Kilda’s half-back line, I cannot see significant differences in the either playing rosters from the 2008 season (that resulted in very similar finals campaigns) to the 2009 season (which has seen the Saints make it to the big dance) …

    So my question is … What have the Saints done between the end of the 2008 season and now to win 5 more home and away matches than us; and more importantly make it to the last week in September ????
    WOOF Member 422

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Stuck in the middle with you
    Posts
    8,201
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    I think it's a couple of things...

    Their approach to defensive pressure seems to have improved tenfold... talk all this year has been about their ability to stifle opponents. Ours has improved, but not enough, IMO.

    They have gotten more out of players who have had great potential for quite a while. No one feared Kosi and Custard last year, and in '09 the 'Twin Towers' have built a great rep. We've had to continue to manufacture scores with a midget forward line, incredibly we were, for the most part, able to do so this season.
    [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    5,864
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    They have developed a structure and a game plan that revolves around their tall defenders and forwards, the latter of which we don't have. They have created a culture whereby every player must perform and earn their spot and not rely on being selected based on reputation, which we have not implemented. Their forwards are fantastic at applying defensive pressure, which despite the fact we don't have to carry a gorilla down there we are behind in, partly due to the age of our players there
    If you kicked five goals and Tom Boyd kicked five goals, Tom Boyd kicked more goals than you.

    Formerly gogriff

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    4,606
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by Scraggers View Post
    So my question is … What have the Saints done between the end of the 2008 season and now to win 5 more home and away matches than us;
    Adhere to a simple yet extremely-effective game plan, and apply themselves consistently, to a man, week-in, week-out, from their stars to their footsoldiers.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scraggers View Post
    and more importantly make it to the last week in September ????
    That one's easy. They had the good fortune of drawing us as prelim opponents.
    BORDERLINE FLYING

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    E.J. Whitten Stand
    Posts
    17,220
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocket Science View Post

    That one's easy. They had the good fortune of drawing us as prelim opponents.
    Harsh, but sadly, very true.
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,018
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewP6 View Post
    I think it's a couple of things...

    Their approach to defensive pressure seems to have improved tenfold... talk all this year has been about their ability to stifle opponents. Ours has improved, but not enough, IMO.

    They have gotten more out of players who have had great potential for quite a while. No one feared Kosi and Custard last year, and in '09 the 'Twin Towers' have built a great rep. We've had to continue to manufacture scores with a midget forward line, incredibly we were, for the most part, able to do so this season.
    Massive improvements from the recycled players they picked up in draft over the last 2 years.

    King and Garinder are injury free, and are working very well the ruck. Gardiner has had an outstanding year, and he adds a massive marking presence.

    Dawson has add depth in the backline, and his kicking has been highly efficient this year.

    Schneider is perfect foil to milne. Much harder and tougher player.

    Lenny hayes has got to be a brownlow favourite. He has been playing up there with the angels.

    Riewoldt is getting the deliver from a gut running midfield, and less spotlight has been put on Kosi, so all he has to do is just mark the ball.

    Their tackling is much harder, and they run run run more. Their back six have clicked nad have an inante ability to work together. Blake, Fisher and sam gilbert are having sensationaly seasons.

    Even Clarke, who I thought was a spud, showed some good marking and running on friday.
    Young kids: clinton jones, mcqualter, gilberg, dempster, are playing some great footy.

    the side has overall improved, from everyone, and Lyon has recruited cunningly with some luck to get a spine into a team which was soft.

    Remember story when Lyons first came and they did not do squats. He could not believe it, the players just didn't have the strength in the lower half of their bodies.

    The team is believing Lyon's plan and strategy now, and its obvious all the players are on board now. Lyon has addressed definicies even in their stars with Dal santo and Ball. dropping them. Can you imagine eade doing that to teach Eagleton, or Gia a lesson in hardness and countessed footy?

    Massive massive difference from last year to this year.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,179
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    They'd want to win next week because, as Hawthorn have shown, structure/game plans can be overcome, but personnel cannot.

    For the sake of the game (and our prospects) next year, I hope the Cats win next week. If the Saints get up, all other clubs imitate the reigning premier, which means shit low scoring football and endless packs and zones will be the norm next year. We play as close to the Cats' game style as anyone, so if they win other clubs will imitate the more attacking game plan (which we are already a couple of years ahead of).

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    3,509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewP6 View Post
    I think it's a couple of things...

    Their approach to defensive pressure seems to have improved tenfold... talk all this year has been about their ability to stifle opponents. Ours has improved, but not enough, IMO.

    They have gotten more out of players who have had great potential for quite a while. No one feared Kosi and Custard last year, and in '09 the 'Twin Towers' have built a great rep. We've had to continue to manufacture scores with a midget forward line, incredibly we were, for the most part, able to do so this season.
    I don't buy that as an excuse ... between Kosi and Reiwoldt they have kicked a similar amount of goals and taken similar amount of inside 50 marks (2008 to 2009).

    Our forward line also has similar stats (2008 to 2009).

    I do agree with their improved defensive pressure
    WOOF Member 422

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,253
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Great thread this. Another factor is they have not had injuries to key players as they ahve in the past. Kosi has been injured every year for long periods, as have other players over the years. The Saints have been injury free and also have some depth to cover players not performing.
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Stuck in the middle with you
    Posts
    8,201
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by Scraggers View Post
    I don't buy that as an excuse ... between Kosi and Reiwoldt they have kicked a similar amount of goals and taken similar amount of inside 50 marks (2008 to 2009).

    Our forward line also has similar stats (2008 to 2009).

    I do agree with their improved defensive pressure
    Wasn't offering an excuse...but those two are definitely working better this year, with the delivery they're getting, than last year. And I'd put up with them in our side (even if Kosi couldn't see a train coming with his peripheral vision, and Custard is a prick)...
    [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Stuck in the middle with you
    Posts
    8,201
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by macca View Post
    Can you imagine eade doing that to teach Eagleton, or Gia a lesson in hardness and countessed footy?

    Massive massive difference from last year to this year.
    Don't believe our depth is as good, making it harder to "make statements" like that.

    Yes the saints are very different, but they turned it round in basically a preseason. As did Geelong, after the now famous "season review"... so there's got to be some hope.
    [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Paul Roos has filled in a police report on his missing game plan. Police believe an inside job with Roos knowing the offender one ROSS LYON. The cats will defeat Stkilda comfortably next week

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    3,509
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by AndrewP6 View Post
    Don't believe our depth is as good, making it harder to "make statements" like that.

    Yes the saints are very different, but they turned it round in basically a preseason. As did Geelong, after the now famous "season review"... so there's got to be some hope.
    This is what I am eluding to ...

    the stats season to season for the key Saints don't show a significant difference, but with limited player change, they have turned things around from just making up numbers to being the number one team.

    Is it a mindset ... a commitment to the cause ... a pact (like Hawthorn) ... what have St. Kilda, Geelong, and Hawthorn done in the pre-season to change their approach ...

    And more importantly ... CAN WE ??
    WOOF Member 422

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Stuck in the middle with you
    Posts
    8,201
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by Scraggers View Post
    Is it a mindset ... a commitment to the cause ... a pact (like Hawthorn) ...

    And more importantly ... CAN WE ??
    Yes to all of the above...once we take care of some deficiencies, in both personnel and mindset.
    [B][COLOR="#0000CD"]Our club was born in blood and boots, not in AFL focus groups.[/COLOR][/B]

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Saints 2008 to 2009 ... What's the difference?

    I think it is clear as day, they picked up Farren Ray

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •