Easton Wood

[LostDoggy]

That being the case I wouldn't have thought that Easton hits the target 5 times out of 6.

I thought somewhere along the line that a kick over 40m that didn't result in the opposition winning clear possssion was an effective kick... Is that not the case?

What has 40 metres got to do with anything?

Mate, I'm not producing the stats. They are prepared by Pro-Stats. If you and Des want to dispute them, give them a call and tell them where they are going wrong.

[LostDoggy]

That being the case I wouldn't have thought that Easton hits the target 5 times out of 6.

I thought somewhere along the line that a kick over 40m that didn't result in the opposition winning clear possssion was an effective kick... Is that not the case?

Yep, was just going to post this -- long kicks are measured as effective regardless of outcome, which is a little bit bollocks, but hey.

[Mofra]

He does have a propensity to look for the longer option which is not a bad thing long term. He's exceeded 2010 expectations by all accounts and is set for a massive 2011.

[Desipura]

Yep, was just going to post this -- long kicks are measured as effective regardless of outcome, which is a little bit bollocks, but hey.

Stats bollocks? Surely not
Dont question anything EJ Smith posts as we know he does not like it. It upsets him when someone asks a perfectly sensible question.

[LostDoggy]

S It upsets him when someone asks a perfectly sensible question.

How would you know - you haven't asked one yet

[Desipura]

How would you know - you haven't asked one yet

I did and Mantis did and you cracked the sulks.

[LostDoggy]

I did and Mantis did and you cracked the sulks.

Nah, EJ is cool.. and so are you and Mantis, of course. Let's all take a deep breath..

[Desipura]

Nah, EJ is cool.. and so are you and Mantis, of course. Let's all take a deep breath..

Group hug

[LostDoggy]

Group hug

That's the (somewhat gay, to labour the point from another thread, not that there's anything wrong with that) spirit...

[LostDoggy]

That's the (somewhat gay, to labour the point from another thread, not that there's anything wrong with that) spirit...

I'm not going there

[Desipura]

I'm not going there

Me neither, I dont share soap with anyone.

[Scorlibo]

He tends to be a little different to our other rebounders for mine; more of a straight ahead, see space & run into type of rebounder as opposed to Gilbee's long spot-ups, Harbrow's evasiveness and Shaggy running wide down the wing to deliver. Seems to favour the corridor much more.

Agree with that, although a lot of the time I mistake him for Gilbee, who tends to use the corridor whenever he can also. Another Gilbee? Another Griffen? Either way, I'm happy.

That being the case I wouldn't have thought that Easton hits the target 5 times out of 6.

I thought somewhere along the line that a kick over 40m that didn't result in the opposition winning clear possssion was an effective kick... Is that not the case?

Correct.

Yep, was just going to post this -- long kicks are measured as effective regardless of outcome, which is a little bit bollocks, but hey.

Not quite regardless of outcome, they can't be clanger kicks as Mantis mentioned. It stacks up when you think about it, if a player launches a long ball from the centre circle into the middle of their fifty, and the ball at that point is anyone's to win, I'd say that's a pretty good result for the team in question.

They are prepared by Pro-Stats.

Champion Data source the official AFL stats.

[stefoid]

Me neither, I dont share soap with anyone.

Friends at last, united in homophobia

[Dancin' Douggy]

What a cracking game from Easton today.
An absolute cracker.

[GVGjr]

What a cracking game from Easton today.
An absolute cracker.

Yes it was a break out game for him. C