Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Ben Mckinley

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    The Kennel
    Posts
    15,564
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    We need the exact opposite of McKinley in our forward line. He is slow, not overy tall and provides no defensive pressure in the forward 50. I would personally avoid at all costs.
    Hmm he sounds dodgy then if thats the case. Dont wont slow blokes the way the game is played these days...

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,920
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    We have Ben McKinley on the rookie list, his name's Matthew Panos. Same sort of players, lead, mark, kick goal, one dimensional. Don't need him.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    We need the exact opposite of McKinley in our forward line. He is slow, not overy tall and provides no defensive pressure in the forward 50. I would personally avoid at all costs.
    This.

    In the right side, McKinley might be OK but his game doesn't suit the modern trend. His kicking went a little wayward since '08 too.

    Much prefer the Knights/A. Davey types.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Yarraville
    Posts
    9,882
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    Quote Originally Posted by Sedat View Post
    We need the exact opposite of McKinley in our forward line. He is slow, not overy tall and provides no defensive pressure in the forward 50. I would personally avoid at all costs.
    Agreed, he's very much what Higgins was this year. The last thing we need is another "mid-sized" forward, meaning someone who takes marks on the lead, can't crumb, can't take a pack mark, and isn't quick enough to put on defensive pressure. We have a heap of these.
    Western Bulldogs: We exist to win premierships

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    10,183
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    Forgot to mention he is poor aerobically as well.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    14,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    Poor defensive side and always looks stuffed!
    No thanks

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,612
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    Would not persue him. Hasn't impressed at Westcoast.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    This really should be in the AFL Talk Forum.
    85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    4 Weeks before the Draft that year I wrote one players name on the Whiteboard at work that I wanted us to draft Ben Mckinley. Was quite annoyed we took Addison instead (still am). He was touted as an early teens pick.

    He kicked 71 goals that year including 12 in the Finals. Was named at FF in the TAC side that year. (Higgins was on the bench and Selwood on a flank).

    He has really bulked up and only needs a decent midfield so would absolutely go for him.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Ben Mckinley

    I think he could turn out to be a good lead up forward pocket, however more suited to a team like carlton as we already have Grant, Jones and Hall.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •