I think that GVGjr might have alluded to this prior to the draft but isn't it ironic that Geelong didn't use pick 58 which they insisted on receiving from us in exchange for Nathan Djukerra.
They used it to upgrade Pods which they could have done with a much later pick.
I think we must have sent a boy (Dalrymple) to do a man's job. Imagine him going toe to toe with Balmey and Wells. I'm not certain what the dilineation of duties are among our recruiting & list management staff and who does the negotiations but the buck would have to stop with Fantasia wouldn't it?
I also thought the same thing, however Im not so sure its a simple as that.
Reality is how badly did we want Djukerra? Perhaps we did overplay our hand with how badly we wanted him.
Geelong like us are not in the business of giving other clubs an advantage by trading players for 4th round picks when they are worth a 3rd round.
I think the situation is similar to the Everitt one last year and the Hill one this year. We didn't get what we belived was market value for the player so the trade's did not happen.
Geelong believed that Djukerra was worth a 3rd round pick not a 4th round pick regardless if they were going to use the pick or not.
I know Tom Hill came through the Northern Knights program as a junior and Dalrymple was there for a while as well. Anyone know if they have a history together and if that played some part in Dalrymple's choice?
That might sound like a leading question but I am genuinely curious about it and did also note that Veszpremi came through the Northern Knights program as well.
I got a hold of the list via a wikileak.
No idea, but we had Schofield & Skinner very high on our list.
I did hear that we were surprised a couple of kids picked in the 30's went so early and had thought they might be available when we had our first 'live' pick.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"