Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,838
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Big men, big worries

    I think 3 ruckmen would make us too inflexible. While Roughead may be able to play multiple positions, he wouldn't offer us a big enough difference IMO to change the game up for our benefit. I think what you need from the sub is someone who can come in when others are tired and just go full pelt for a half. This means i would like an attack minded running player, like a Sherman. Someone you throw in and tell to create. I woud have nominated Veszpremi as a chance for this role as his fitness is limited and he fits the attacking type of player I want but going by recent reports he might not be able to push as high into the midfield as I would prefer.
    I should leave it alone but you're not right

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,651
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Big men, big worries

    Quote Originally Posted by West-Dog View Post
    I vote for the Flip-Side ,as I stated in the other thread we use three ruckmen , Hudson starting, Minson bench, Roughhead Sub . By doing this we keep them fresher throughout the season , Roughhead has the ability to cover HF or HB in case of an injury meaning a reshuffle due to injury doesn't change the structure too much , and if Roughhead is on early due to an injury I,m fine with that as the second ruckman on the ground can rest in the goal square . Now this of course means our bench of two players , one back , one forward will have to be well managed , the emphasis will be on skill and flexibility for the bench players . Ward is as must have for the Back , Jones is putting his hand up for the Forward.

    Interesting times !!

    .
    I have never seen him play in defence, have you?

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Big men, big worries

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    I have never seen him play in defence, have you?
    The bench player classed as a back is a multi position player back/ midfield , the same as the forward is forward/ midfield , the two player bench I have outlined put a greater pressure on selection because of the flexibility required

    .

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,087
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Big men, big worries

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    I have never seen him play in defence, have you?
    Ward has definitely played in the back half at times. Can't quote exact games but has played half back minding a player on more than one occasion in 2009, but probably only for a quarter or so. He defends well when asked to do that.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,727
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Big men, big worries

    Quote Originally Posted by Bulldog Joe View Post
    Ward has definitely played in the back half at times. Can't quote exact games but has played half back minding a player on more than one occasion in 2009, but probably only for a quarter or so. He defends well when asked to do that.
    I seem to recall that as well although I don't think it's been for a full game.
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •