Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    Cooney acknowledged as playing injured by Eade.

    9% by foot. How is that in any way useful for the team? 10 of his 11 kicks went to the opposition - thats better than some of their own players!

    http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/af...-1226056398329

    Cannot get my head around playing him at all. We would be better off playing someone else in the midfield, and letting cooney recover?

    Djekurra I would say - OK, he turns it over. So does Cooney.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    620
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    I read that article and wondered whether this quote:

    "Some players with his talent and his history could probably say: 'Ah, no, I'm not going to be able to play to that standard so I don't want to play because I'm going to hurt my reputation"

    was a swipe at Brian Lake?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,848
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    Dont know, but we played marco because we had to and have been rewarded.

    We got Djekurra precisely to give us some ground level burst around the packs, Id say he is our best 'fit' for cooney. Not perfect, but you use what you have.

    Use him now.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    Quote Originally Posted by Templeton31 View Post
    I read that article and wondered whether this quote:

    "Some players with his talent and his history could probably say: 'Ah, no, I'm not going to be able to play to that standard so I don't want to play because I'm going to hurt my reputation"

    was a swipe at Brian Lake?
    That's the way I saw it.
    85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    E.J. Whitten Stand
    Posts
    17,231
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    Quote Originally Posted by Templeton31 View Post
    I read that article and wondered whether this quote:

    "Some players with his talent and his history could probably say: 'Ah, no, I'm not going to be able to play to that standard so I don't want to play because I'm going to hurt my reputation"

    was a swipe at Brian Lake?
    Of course it was.
    Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wheelers Hill
    Posts
    4,200
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    It's a really difficult call. My understanding is that Cooney's knee is not going to get worse, suggesting it will remain as is or improve. Is he such a liability at the moment that you don't play him?

    On the plus side he seemed to have no trouble finding the ball yesterday but for perhaps the first time ever, I had my heart in my mouth every time he had the ball in his hands. I think we can expect to see him up forward for most game time until his knee improves. I'm comfortable with that although it does leave us short on full time midfielders.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    I hate the double standards our club dishes out.

    One stage, we are not going to play injured players (Hall, Higgins spring to mind), then we do a complete flip and play an injured Cooney.

    Not good enough Dogs.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wheelers Hill
    Posts
    4,200
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    Quote Originally Posted by nawrocki View Post
    I hate the double standards our club dishes out.

    One stage, we are not going to play injured players (Hall, Higgins spring to mind), then we do a complete flip and play an injured Cooney.

    Not good enough Dogs.
    Don't disagree but there are certainly players who can play through injury and still be contributors. I'd suggest Hall isn't one of those at this late stage of his career and Higgins has proved in the past that he is unable to provide sufficient run when he has groin complaints.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    Quote Originally Posted by nawrocki View Post
    I hate the double standards our club dishes out.

    One stage, we are not going to play injured players (Hall, Higgins spring to mind), then we do a complete flip and play an injured Cooney.

    Not good enough Dogs.
    There are some type of injuries though that necessitate rest & others that don't. Rest those that need it, but if rest isn't going to help, then keep playing.
    85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Doglands
    Posts
    39,873
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    Quote Originally Posted by stefoid View Post
    Cooney acknowledged as playing injured by Eade.

    9% by foot. How is that in any way useful for the team? 10 of his 11 kicks went to the opposition - thats better than some of their own players!

    http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/af...-1226056398329

    Cannot get my head around playing him at all. We would be better off playing someone else in the midfield, and letting cooney recover?

    Djekurra I would say - OK, he turns it over. So does Cooney.

    To me this article is a slap at Lake and it remains to be seen if the club can turn it into a positive. I hope the club isn't making excuses for Cooney's poor form though
    Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    As I posted in the other thread

    Cooney played within his limitations , he could only move a short distance and handpass, he had no speed off the mark , there were many occasions were he could have chased or blocked but he just could'nt run , his kicking was awkward and rushed , its entirely possible he played with a few needles , as far as I,m concerned if he needs an arthroscope to clean up some scar tissue/ cartilage or has a ligament strain then he goes and gets his knee fixed so he's good to go later in the season, there is no point risking him , put him on the LTIL and promote Barlow

    .

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    13,349
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    If it is a slap at Lake, regardless of Eades relationship with Lake I fear it won't end well.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    Quote Originally Posted by Templeton31 View Post
    I read that article and wondered whether this quote:

    "Some players with his talent and his history could probably say: 'Ah, no, I'm not going to be able to play to that standard so I don't want to play because I'm going to hurt my reputation"

    was a swipe at Brian Lake?
    Yes, KT31, thought the exact same thing! I reckon it might have been.....

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    3,147
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Cooney acknowledged as playing injured

    I reckon he was generalizing. It was more about the compliment to Cooney than anything else.

    Nothing to do with Brian.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •