Therein lies the problem with Dogs supporters, we overrate our players. Saints were 20-2 that season and smashed us twice in H&A - they were far better than us. Eade coached the pants off Lyon that night, and IMO he did to Thompson in the 2008 PF as well. You don't just rock up and beat teams with 21-1 or 20-2 records in a cutthroat final for fun, particularly after being smashed by the same teams earlier in those seasons.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
The curse is dead.
We weren't the favorites going into all 3 prelims, in fact against the saints last season we limped into the preliminary final due to the number of injuries as well as playing ageing stars who were passed it.
Last edited by Desipura; 21-08-2011 at 04:14 PM.
Absolutely agree, Sedat. And in 2011, it couldn't be sustained because the constant turnover of players, for whatever reason, meant that structures weren't adhered to as we would have expected.
It does raise the question, though, of why we went away from our structures rather too frequently, and played some very poor quarters and halves of football over the last 2 years. Obviously some replacements lacked experience, endurance and skill. You would think that if the whole list had done the training until the forward press, for example, was so ingrained, forced personnel changes may not have cost us quite so much.
Jeez, I head out bush for a week and Eade gets the chop.
If Fantasia signs Rhode, I'm heading out for another week
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
Quite possibly it was but it was never ever the best list in the comp. In fact it was never the 2nd best list in the comp. You mention plodders that the Saints have but seem to forget the amount of list cloggers we had on the list. Look again at that 22 for the prelim final and match up plodder with plodder and then A grader with A grader. We don't fare well with either count.