Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 30
  1. 26-08-2011, 09:00 AM #1
    The Coon Dog's Avatar
    The Coon Dog
    The Coon Dog is offline WOOF Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    7,664
    Post Thanks / Like

    Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Mike Sheahan - HS - 26 August

    YOU won't hear confirmation until Collingwood completes all engagements for 2011, but Michael Malthouse won't be at the club next year - in any capacity.

    It's a decision that's understood to have been fixed in his mind for several weeks. It remains private to avoid any potential disruption to the club's 2011 premiership campaign.

    What club president Eddie McGuire contrived as the perfect succession plan in July 2009 has been torpedoed by a number of issues, principally Malthouse's growing frustration with a use-by date imposed upon him and Nathan Buckley's determination to assume total control - as promised - after the current season.

    Article in full...
    85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 26-08-2011, 10:04 AM #2
    Desipura's Avatar
    Desipura
    Desipura is offline Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Where do we think he will coach next year?
    My guess in order would be
    St Kilda
    Carlton
    Melb
    Dogs
    Adelaide
    Port Adelaide
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 26-08-2011, 10:38 AM #3
    Mantis's Avatar
    Mantis
    Mantis is offline Hall of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,652
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    If Carlton bomb out in the finals he would be a shoe in for that job as Ratten won't survive.

    It was always on the cards seeing as though Mick & Swann are seen to be quite close.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 26-08-2011, 10:47 AM #4
    1eyedog's Avatar
    1eyedog
    1eyedog is offline Hall of Fame
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Dogsville
    Posts
    12,813
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Discussion on SEN this morning saying that he WOULD honour his contract at Collingwood next year following on from some comments made by McGuire last night
    But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 26-08-2011, 10:53 AM #5
    Ghost Dog's Avatar
    Ghost Dog
    Ghost Dog is offline Bulldog Team of the Century
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Shanghai
    Posts
    9,426
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Quote Originally Posted by Desipura View Post
    Where do we think he will coach next year?
    My guess in order would be
    St Kilda
    Carlton
    Melb
    Dogs
    Adelaide
    Port Adelaide
    St Kilda? No way Lyon will walk away ' unfinished business'.
    Carlton fans would be livid if they got rid of ratten for a Collingwood coach
    Melbourne have no chance to win a flag anytime soon
    Dogs are well placed if they play their cards right.
    You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― Epicurus
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 26-08-2011, 11:25 AM #6
    LostDoggy
    LostDoggy is offline WOOF Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Malthouse with Milne? A million to one
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 26-08-2011, 11:28 AM #7
    Desipura's Avatar
    Desipura
    Desipura is offline Coaching Staff
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    4,367
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost Dog View Post
    St Kilda? No way Lyon will walk away ' unfinished business'.
    Carlton fans would be livid if they got rid of ratten for a Collingwood coach
    Melbourne have no chance to win a flag anytime soon
    Dogs are well placed if they play their cards right.
    Totally disagree, I think you are thinking with your heart.
    Alot of Carlton supporters want Ratten gone,
    Lyon has apparently been offered a 5 year contract at Melbourne
    How are Dogs well placed? Why are we so more advanced than Melboourne?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 26-08-2011, 11:30 AM #8
    LostDoggy
    LostDoggy is offline WOOF Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    8,900
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    What if Carlton win the first final? Likely. Then lose the second. Will Ratten still be there?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 26-08-2011, 11:35 AM #9
    Ghost Dog's Avatar
    Ghost Dog
    Ghost Dog is offline Bulldog Team of the Century
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Shanghai
    Posts
    9,426
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Quote Originally Posted by Desipura View Post
    Totally disagree, I think you are thinking with your heart.
    Alot of Carlton supporters want Ratten gone,
    Lyon has apparently been offered a 5 year contract at Melbourne
    How are Dogs well placed? Why are we so more advanced than Melboourne?
    Ok I see your points
    Carlton would be hard placed to sack Ratten as his performance ( and the team's ) has been competitive.
    People close to Lyon seem to think he's pretty hard nosed and wants to finish the job at St Kilda. That's what people have told me.
    Melbourne are that much further away from winning a flag than us.
    We have a list that can be pretty competitive and the club is in good shape.
    You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― Epicurus
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 26-08-2011, 11:41 AM #10
    Mantis's Avatar
    Mantis
    Mantis is offline Hall of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,652
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost Dog View Post
    Ok I see your points
    Carlton would be hard placed to sack Ratten as his performance ( and the team's ) has been competitive.
    People close to Lyon seem to think he's pretty hard nosed and wants to finish the job at St Kilda. That's what people have told me.
    Melbourne are that much further away from winning a flag than us.
    We have a list that can be pretty competitive     and the club is in good shape.
    How will both lists look in 2 years time?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 26-08-2011, 12:04 PM #11
    Ghost Dog's Avatar
    Ghost Dog
    Ghost Dog is offline Bulldog Team of the Century
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Shanghai
    Posts
    9,426
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantis View Post
    How will both lists look in 2 years time?
    Who knows really. Injuries can cull players, fortunes can change.
    Melbourne were supposed to be powering along at the moment, according to their supposed recruiting strategy.
    Three years into their plan, they look insipid.
    You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― Epicurus
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 26-08-2011, 12:16 PM #12
    Sockeye Salmon
    Sockeye Salmon is offline Bulldog Team of the Century
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Behind the goals, Geelong Rd end
    Posts
    6,465
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    If I was Lyon I would be running away from St. Kilda as fast as I could.

    The irony is they are heading for long term pain because of him!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 26-08-2011, 02:01 PM #13
    bornadog's Avatar
    bornadog
    bornadog is online now WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Wherever the dogs are playing
    Posts
    61,226
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Quote Originally Posted by Sockeye Salmon View Post
    If I was Lyon I would be running away from St. Kilda as fast as I could.

    The irony is they are heading for long term pain because of him!
    He has a contract for next year so they would have to pay him out. Maybe they can come to a mutual agreement if he gets a job at Melbourne?
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 26-08-2011, 02:09 PM #14
    Mantis's Avatar
    Mantis
    Mantis is offline Hall of Fame
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    14,652
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost Dog View Post
    Who knows really. Injuries can cull players, fortunes can change.
    Melbourne were supposed to be powering along at the moment, according to their supposed recruiting strategy.
    Three years into their plan, they look insipid.
    With no real reliance on mature players they are going along ok.

    Take out both teams over 28's and their list stacks up very well against ours... but it should considering they bottomed out while we were contending.

    Taking away sentiment if I had the choice between coaching the Dogs & the Dees it would be an absolute no brainer.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 26-08-2011, 02:27 PM #15
    The Bulldogs Bite's Avatar
    The Bulldogs Bite
    The Bulldogs Bite is offline Hall of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    10,329
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: Mick Malthouse won't be at Collingwood in 2012

    Melbourne still have a lot to prove though. In fact, they've barely proven anything. If it wasn't for those two games against Collingwood last year, the media would label them as flogs.

    They have a young list - but how many of them are good?

    Melbourne might eventually make finals but they won't do damage IMO.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules