Gram actually tied for the award with Chapman, the tiebreaker was the most number of 3-votes - which is terrible way to do it IMO. From 5 selectors Gram was in everyone's top 3 with 3,2,2,1,1 and Chapman recieved 3,3,3,0,0 - meaning 2 of the selectors could have had him anywhere from 4th to 44th. Should just go with the chairperson's votes, and if that doesn't help get everyone to choose just between those 2 guys, with 5 voters you won't get another tie