http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/mel...-1226174405534
Bit of a wierd one here he was a passenger apparently so I am not sure on why he would be kicked out of anything.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/mel...-1226174405534
Bit of a wierd one here he was a passenger apparently so I am not sure on why he would be kicked out of anything.
Bring back the biff
Regardless that he was a passenger it was his car in the accident so he should have stayed with the car and the driver.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
My son was in an accident and cops said they had to be called because someone was injured and he would be charged.
If no one was injured going by that whats problem.
Anyway i admit that was a strange comment i thought by coppers, but then again cops arent called for other accidents so I am not sure where the line is drawn.
Bring back the biff
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
In that instance the onus is on the driver to report the collision to the nearest Police Station as soon as practicable. If they've waited for a tow it sounds reasonable to me.
As far as 'interviewing' Sylvia goes, I would assume that as a passenger in a single car collision that they would have obtained a statement from him.
What did Sylvia's Mother say?
Comedy gold.
If they've left the scene after an accident (one would assume to avoid a breath test) & caused $70,000 damage to cars that were struck, does the insurance company have to pay out or can they say we're not paying as there was a criminal act committed? Could be expensive for the driver.
85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse!
Depends on the policy, but generally speaking most insurance companies will pay out unless there's alcohol or drugs involved, or the driver is unlicensed. The 'criminal act' essentially has to be comitted in the course of the drving itself, unless the Policy specifies otherwise.