-
01-10-2018, 10:47 AM
#181
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Tradeguru69 says the trade is for Tom Campbell, not pick 6 plus. Great trade for us.
Thanks for your service Tom. Sorry it didn't work out. Oh, hai Chad.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
01-10-2018, 12:11 PM
#182
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
Tradeguru69 says the trade is for Tom Campbell, not pick 6 plus. Great trade for us.
Who is tradeguru69 ?
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
01-10-2018, 12:35 PM
#183
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Who is tradeguru69 ?
In this case I think the name says it all. Some sad 48 year old tosser desperately craving relevance and making stuff up to get some.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
01-10-2018, 12:59 PM
#184
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Who is tradeguru69 ?
The wrong hill to die on
-
01-10-2018, 01:01 PM
#185
Re: The Chad Thread
Mark Robinson and the Herald Sun reporting that Chad has informed Port he wants to stay at the club.
-
01-10-2018, 01:02 PM
#186
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
lemmon
Mark Robinson and the Herald Sun reporting that Chad has informed Port he wants to stay at the club.
So Chad to the dogs is a certainty then.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
01-10-2018, 01:25 PM
#187
Re: The Chad Thread
A little disappointing but I wonder who we next turn our attention to?
-
01-10-2018, 01:38 PM
#188
Re: The Chad Thread
Chad’s management have refuted Slobbo’s story in world record time. He hasn’t made his mind up yet.
"Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 2 Likes
hujsh thanked for this post
-
01-10-2018, 01:38 PM
#189
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
EasternWest
So Chad to the dogs is a certainty then.
You are right, report is not true.
EDit: Sedat beat me to it. What a dick Robbo is.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
01-10-2018, 01:40 PM
#190
Re: The Chad Thread
His management were lightning quick to tell trade radio that.
Chad lives yet.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
01-10-2018, 02:57 PM
#191
Re: The Chad Thread
Well he needs to hurry up and make up his mind !
Bring back the biff
-
01-10-2018, 03:10 PM
#192
Re: The Chad Thread
I wonder if we have plan B if Chad stays at Port or chooses Hawthorn. Do we have other irons in the fire if we are prepared to offer up pick 6 or is it best available at the National Draft?
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
-
01-10-2018, 03:29 PM
#193
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
ratsmac
I wonder if we have plan B if Chad stays at Port or chooses Hawthorn. Do we have other irons in the fire if we are prepared to offer up pick 6 or is it best available at the National Draft?
Im hoping plan B is use pick 6
-
01-10-2018, 03:54 PM
#194
Re: The Chad Thread
Originally Posted by
Topdog
Im hoping plan B is use pick 6
I agree but I'm always worried because of the Jarrad Grant and Christian Howard round 1 selection fiascos. Surely Sam Power can't stuff this year's pick 6 up with available top 10 talent pool.
What also worries me is that not all top 10 kids take the next step e.g. Tambling, O'rouke, Freeman, Toumpas, Anthony Banik an so on for whatever reason didn't live up to their early selection. Trading 6 for a known talent isn't a stupid idea.
I'm happy I'm not the one making these calls.
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
-
01-10-2018, 04:54 PM
#195
Re: The Chad Thread
How many kids do we need? We are already the youngest list in the comp with West and Buku to come. I'd argue we are desperate for a quality 21-26 year old.
On the flip side, we are unlikely to 'challenge' next year so from a forecasting perspective maybe we are better off taking Pick 6 to the draft, getting another year into our list and then look to trade for an established star at the end of next year.
Arguments to be made for both.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes