I think if they do it, Umpires should be able to access video of the incident to make sure it truly warrants the penalty.
"It's over. It's all over."
Rugby is getting better at this.
The referee can consult the TMO and they watch the same footage on the big screen.
The TMO can make a recommendation but the final decision for a sanction sits with the referee.
There was an incident in a recent rugby match between Australia and Argentina where Israel Folau was yellow carded for a tackle in the air (10 minutes in the sin bin). Upon viewing the replay it was apparent Folau had been pushed into the tackle by an Argentinean player.
The referee reversed the decision, brought Folau back onto the field and awarded the penalty to Australia.
I find it a terrible idea. The blatant incidences like Gaff’s this year are extremely rare - so it would be a big measure to bring in to address a very infrequent occurrence. Most other instances are not so clear cut and bringing it in just lends itself to regular controversy.
The push to add more an more rules and complications to an already complicated game is something I am opposed to.
Just a thought.
If the red card comes in, what about if the red carded player to be taken out of the game but that team can still play with 18 players on the field. I find it can be too harsh on a team to play with 1 less player on the field. Maybe cut the offending teams rotations as well. Otherwise leave it as is.
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
Can you imagine in a Grand Final, Wood getting a red card for taking Hannebury out at the knees......that's what would happen. You will get an umpire in the heat of the moment make a snap decision. Video ref will show it was line ball and uphold the decision and the end result is it costs a team a flag. Later the AFL comes out and says that the red card was harsh, but within the boundaries of a correct decision.
The game has done without a red card. Through he 70's and 80's where acts of thuggery were common the game survived. We have 1 thuggish act a season at best and now we need a red card?
If the off field umpire had a say and it was trailed for a season to iron out the kinks, I think the idea has alot of merit.
What is really turning my stomach is the AFL having the "coward punch King " Matthews come out and speak in favour of it.
It's akin to Wayne Carey coming out and speaking against abuse against women, following up with a family morals speech.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
If one of our players was king hit behind play within 1st 5 mins I would want opposition to lose offender for remainder of match. I think if it absolutely clear cut eg Gaff, Matthews a red card is a good thing. Problem will be if the shades of grey if player sent off unfairly. They have red card in vfl - I recall big Will being sent off but I do not think anyone was unconscious. Presume hardly if ever used at vfl level so why not for afl? So, recalling the wonderful Gough 1980s federal election campaign....yes, it’s time.