-
10-09-2019, 12:00 PM
#121
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
Sedat
Why?
Just missing out, but not overly concerned.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
10-09-2019, 12:03 PM
#122
Re: Jack Martin
They were leading the pack for a while, even though we had the higher offer.
I assume we go a little harder at Bruce and Keath now.
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
10-09-2019, 12:06 PM
#123
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
Mofra
They were leading the pack for a while, even though we had the higher offer.
I assume we go a little harder at Bruce and Keath now.
Yep. And a more open mind on Isaac Smith.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
10-09-2019, 12:06 PM
#124
Re: Jack Martin
I'm sick of us being jilted by trade targets.
Every year we keep buttering up and getting sucked in.
-
10-09-2019, 12:23 PM
#125
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
I'm sick of us being jilted by trade targets.
Every year we keep buttering up and getting sucked in.
The more lines you cast into the sea the more chance you will catch a fish.
Listening to Brahm's 3rd Racket
-
10-09-2019, 12:24 PM
#126
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
The Doctor
The more lines you cast into the sea the more chance you will catch a fish.
Except if your North Melbourne.
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
10-09-2019, 12:27 PM
#127
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Just missing out, but not overly concerned.
Agree. Prefer Bruce and Keath with Martin in 3rd place.
-
10-09-2019, 12:28 PM
#128
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
Agree. Prefer Bruce and Keath with Martin in 3rd place.
Same, watching on the weekend not for one second did I wish we had Martin.
-
10-09-2019, 12:37 PM
#129
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
Agree. Prefer Bruce and Keath with Martin in 3rd place.
Yes, some big guys are what we need.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
10-09-2019, 12:42 PM
#130
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
azabob
Except if your North Melbourne.
They've picked up a few in recent years - Polec, Pittard, Higgins, Anderson, Tyson, etc.
I would have liked Martin, I think he would have been a far better player in our system but Bruce and Keath are pressing needs as well.
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
10-09-2019, 12:45 PM
#131
Re: Jack Martin
I think we are still in with a strong chance but if he wants to go elsewhere no problems we will find someone else
I honestly think we should be one of the most attractive clubs for Martin to come and if he can't see it as reported then we cast the net wide as Doc suggests
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
10-09-2019, 12:49 PM
#132
-
10-09-2019, 01:08 PM
#133
Re: Jack Martin
Originally Posted by
Bulldog4life
Agree. Prefer Bruce and Keath with Martin in 3rd place.
Same for me.
-
10-09-2019, 01:28 PM
#134
Re: Jack Martin
Trade week is a month away, let's see how it plays out.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
10-09-2019, 01:32 PM
#135
Re: Jack Martin
Not fussed missing Bruce and Keath major priorities.