-
20-03-2020, 10:20 PM
#286
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Howmany *!*!*!*!ing missed or broken tackles?
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
-
20-03-2020, 10:20 PM
#287
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Our blokes should just stand and watch. Especially when it goes over their forward 50.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
20-03-2020, 10:20 PM
#288
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Have we ever been first to the ball? It’s like we’re unfit
-
20-03-2020, 10:20 PM
#289
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Will we ever learn that Mitch Wallis isn’t an AFL standard mid?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
20-03-2020, 10:22 PM
#290
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Is it really 10 I50s? Surely that's impossible
-
20-03-2020, 10:22 PM
#291
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Maybe we have found the answer.
Ignore the flanks, use the corridor. Roll the dice dogs
Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers
-
20-03-2020, 10:23 PM
#292
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Originally Posted by
Mofra
Jesus, we're questioning English based on one shortened half against the best ruck in the competition?
He's basically the age Morris was on debut, except he's 207cm.
He’ll be a player, but he’s been embarrassed tonight, physically monstered.
He’s just not ready for the no. 1 ruck role.
Float Along - Fill Your Lungs
-
20-03-2020, 10:23 PM
#293
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
100% goal kicking accuracy. I guess that's at least something to consider as the house burns around us.
-
20-03-2020, 10:23 PM
#294
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
On the bright side we are nailing every chance at goal.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
20-03-2020, 10:23 PM
#295
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Who’ll hit a target when Suckling retires?
-
20-03-2020, 10:25 PM
#296
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Gardner is lucky to hit his foot when he kicks.. AFL player.. ok!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
20-03-2020, 10:26 PM
#297
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
-
20-03-2020, 10:27 PM
#298
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Stop scapegoating Garder guys.
- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
20-03-2020, 10:27 PM
#299
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
Naughton not fit. Why is he playing?
-
20-03-2020, 10:30 PM
#300
Re: WB Game Day V Collingwood R1 2020
1. Cordy is not a full back. (And Nobody has told him the principles of kicking in.)
2. Collingwood knows that they have a dominant height advantage in the forward zone. So you can see them kick to setup 25 metres from goal. They have not had a long shot at goal in 14 scores.
3. Because of the height disadvantage it has been common to see the Dogs have 3 backmen attempting to spoil in a pack. This gives the Collingwood forwards the chance to spread.
4. The Dogs have been static. Not one attacking foot pass to a runner in the clear. Still handball focused with a receiver too close.
5. Kicks into the forward line are poor. High floaters after Collingwood has had time to fall back and set up.
6. Ruck structure doesn’t allow flexibility, needs a sacrificial spoiler so English can remain a significant contributor.
7. Dogs are standing too far from opposition. Allows them time to setup. They are getting no value from defending grass.
8. At most stoppages Collingwood has players away from the ball and players are looking for them.
9. Cox has dropped the ball a number of times and not been penalised.
10. Grundy hits the body, then the ball. Our rucks are not taking the hit into their routine.
11.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 3 Likes