-
26-10-2020, 09:18 PM
#766
Re: 2020 Player movement
Collingwood have told Adam Trealor he is not a required player. Wow!
-
26-10-2020, 09:24 PM
#767
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
Collingwood have told Adam Trealor he is not a required player. Wow!
Shouldve went to Richmond!
-
26-10-2020, 09:27 PM
#768
Re: 2020 Player movement
You have to wonder what’s going on there....he’s a decent player
-
26-10-2020, 09:31 PM
#769
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
You have to wonder what’s going on there....he’s a decent player
He's on a big back ended contract I think too. Maybe they can't afford him any more.
Unusual.
-
26-10-2020, 09:39 PM
#770
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
Who on here mentioned Mason weeks ago?
That would be me.
It makes sense on many levels.
-
26-10-2020, 09:40 PM
#771
Re: 2020 Player movement
Any other clubs with serious salary cap problems? Maybe we could pick off a good player or two.
The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.
-
26-10-2020, 09:44 PM
#772
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
The Bulldogs Bite
That would be me.
It makes sense on many levels.
Doesn't quite for me. Can you please expand on that?
The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride.
-
26-10-2020, 09:57 PM
#773
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
bulldogsthru&thru
You have to wonder what’s going on there....he’s a decent player
I heard it was to free up cash for De Goey.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
26-10-2020, 09:59 PM
#774
Re: 2020 Player movement
Lauchie young to North. Knocked us back for a proper contract not a rookie contract that we offered.
Bring back the biff
-
26-10-2020, 10:08 PM
#775
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
comrade
"But we're getting Jamarra"
"That's good"
2nd ruck issue solved.
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.
-
26-10-2020, 10:12 PM
#776
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
2nd ruck issue solved.
....
That’s bad.
Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.
-
26-10-2020, 10:15 PM
#777
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
ledge
Lauchie young to North. Knocked us back for a proper contract not a rookie contract that we offered.
Not a best 25 player and we know it.
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
26-10-2020, 10:26 PM
#778
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
Grantysghost
Shouldve went to Richmond!
Ouch!
They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works every time!
Brian Fantana.
-
26-10-2020, 10:30 PM
#779
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
ledge
Lauchie young to North. Knocked us back for a proper contract not a rookie contract that we offered.
Another player bevo gives games to early then seem to disappear in the reserves the year after. Looked promising, like his extra length for a flanker but we do have too many on the list.
Last edited by kruder; 27-10-2020 at 01:04 AM.
-
26-10-2020, 10:35 PM
#780
Re: 2020 Player movement
Originally Posted by
ledge
Lauchie young to North. Knocked us back for a proper contract not a rookie contract that we offered.
Jake Aarts and Chol are both finishing their second year on the rookie list. I would be happy with either of them if Richmond aren't able to fit them on their primary list.