-
16-07-2022, 10:52 PM
#166
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
The 100% maddest post on WOOF yet
Madder than that, there's a dude who constantly goes on about a mythical contract status thread like it's a real thing even though there's no evidence of such a thing anywhere.
Total lunacy.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
17-07-2022, 01:01 AM
#167
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
1eyedog
The 100% maddest post on WOOF yet
It's not like there hasn't been some solid competition over the years....
TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.
-
17-07-2022, 01:02 AM
#168
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
EasternWest
Madder than that, there's a dude who constantly goes on about a mythical contract status thread like it's a real thing even though there's no evidence of such a thing anywhere.
Total lunacy.
Dude, we're just supposed to keep him comfortable and balanced with a consistent message. This doesn't help.
TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.
-
23-07-2022, 03:36 PM
#169
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
This is an interesting short watch (not sure if the full thing is available somewhere) : Danny McGinlay and Toyd watching the 16 prelim.
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CfVDU2t...d=MDJmNzVkMjY=
-
23-07-2022, 05:14 PM
#170
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Bulldog Facebook sites.
WOOF by comparison with current FB sites is supreme.
When accessing them I feel like recommending WOOF to them.
Maybe their moderators, if they have them, would block.
Methinks I will do a modest promo of WOOF with my android on FB.
-
23-07-2022, 05:31 PM
#171
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
BornInDroopSt'54
Bulldog Facebook sites.
WOOF by comparison with current FB sites is supreme.
When accessing them I feel like recommending WOOF to them.
Maybe their moderators, if they have them, would block.
Methinks I will do a modest promo of WOOF with my android on FB.
Don’t bring the rabble to woof
More of an In Bruges guy?
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
23-07-2022, 05:33 PM
#172
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
BornInDroopSt'54
Bulldog Facebook sites.
WOOF by comparison with current FB sites is supreme.
When accessing them I feel like recommending WOOF to them.
Maybe their moderators, if they have them, would block.
Methinks I will do a modest promo of WOOF with my android on FB.
Agree. The loyal bulldog supporter one is fine but half a dozen others attract some pretty insecure individuals. I've thought of doing the same thing.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
23-07-2022, 05:44 PM
#173
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
azabob
Don’t bring the rabble to woof
Yeah we are already here!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 5 Likes
chef thanked for this post
-
24-07-2022, 06:29 AM
#174
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
25-07-2022, 12:00 AM
#175
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Could this be popular WOOF poster EasternWest's brother or cousin?
https://cricketaddictor.com/cricket-...in-fc-cricket/
Sam Northeast of Glamorgan made the ninth-highest first-class score in history on Saturday against Leicestershire, scoring 410 not out.
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
25-07-2022, 01:14 AM
#176
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
Twodogs
Popular. I knew you were into me.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
25-07-2022, 04:34 PM
#177
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
EasternWest
Madder than that, there's a dude who constantly goes on about a mythical contract status thread like it's a real thing even though there's no evidence of such a thing anywhere.
Total lunacy.
I demand satisfaction!
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
25-07-2022, 04:44 PM
#178
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Maybe it was the hallucinations that come with tipping all sorts of toxins into my body to fight the 'rona, but was thinking the other day why is that key defenders play upwards of 95-100% TOG, but key forwards only play 80-90% of game time?
You would think each would do similar amounts of running so why is it that the forwards get a spell, but the defenders don't?
-
25-07-2022, 05:00 PM
#179
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
BornInDroopSt'54
Bulldog Facebook sites.
WOOF by comparison with current FB sites is supreme.
When accessing them I feel like recommending WOOF to them.
Maybe their moderators, if they have them, would block.
Methinks I will do a modest promo of WOOF with my android on FB.
Please no, I like WOOF, I rate follower groups like this:
WOOF - High brow, smart, good convo, mostly all non-nufftie takes
BigFooty - Dirty, lotta content, lotta shit, lotta nufftie takes
Facebook WB Groups - the nufftie central with takes such as ''we should trade Naughton to WCE for NicNat'' and ''We signed Bont on too long of contract who knows what he'll be like in 5 years''
I like keeping them separate for a reason.
"Its always good to win the Ashes test match'' - Libba, AFL Grand Final, 2016
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes
-
25-07-2022, 05:02 PM
#180
Re: "Not worth a thread" chat
Originally Posted by
Vred
Please no, I like WOOF, I rate follower groups like this:
WOOF - High brow, smart, good convo, mostly all non-nufftie takes
BigFooty - Dirty, lotta content, lotta shit, lotta nufftie takes
Facebook WB Groups - the nufftie central with takes such as ''we should trade Naughton to WCE for NicNat'' and ''We signed Bont on too long of contract who knows what he'll be like in 5 years''
I like keeping them separate for a reason.
Good post. Love the word mostly.