-
28-09-2022, 10:47 AM
#391
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
There is a fair bit if speculation that the AFL will ditch the sub rule for next season.
Would this mean clubs could potentially play 2 ruckman rather than 1 and a back-up?
I think Lobb's main appeal is that he provides a decent back up for when English needs a spell but if we could play English and Sweet does that minimise his appeal for us?
Why would the sub rule effect the ruck situation?
Besides, Sweet at this stage is only good at tapouts, and nothing else.
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
28-09-2022, 10:53 AM
#392
Re: Rory Lobb
The argument currently being made is that there should be 5 players available on the bench for each club to manage as they see fit. The extra player allows cover for injuries or for tactical purposes.
I know Bevo has stated it would be difficult managing 5 players so he may be more likely to carry a tall which would alleviate the need to have a ruckman that can also play other positions. If that's the case, does the need for Lobb diminish?
-
28-09-2022, 11:18 AM
#393
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
Swoop
The argument currently being made is that there should be 5 players available on the bench for each club to manage as they see fit. The extra player allows cover for injuries or for tactical purposes.
I know Bevo has stated it would be difficult managing 5 players so he may be more likely to carry a tall which would alleviate the need to have a ruckman that can also play other positions. If that's the case, does the need for Lobb diminish?
We don't have any other ruckman at that level. What happens if Tim has an injury again?
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
28-09-2022, 11:21 AM
#394
-
28-09-2022, 11:37 AM
#395
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
Swoop
Stef Martin...
Cooked
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.
-
28-09-2022, 11:43 AM
#396
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
Swoop
Stef Martin...
May as well give Lade a list spot too haha
The curse is dead.
-
28-09-2022, 01:08 PM
#397
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
chef
May as well give Lade a list spot too haha
Would help take pressure off the off field soft salary cap! We could get an extra assistant coach!
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 2 Likes
-
28-09-2022, 03:23 PM
#398
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
bornadog
Why would the sub rule effect the ruck situation?
Besides, Sweet at this stage is only good at tapouts, and nothing else.
Instead of 4 players on the bench and a medical sub the speculation is that there will just be 5 players. No increase of interchanges though from what I understand.
I'm asking the question if that will mean a team like ours could now play 2 ruck man instead of 1 and a chop out option.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
28-09-2022, 03:25 PM
#399
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
Swoop
The argument currently being made is that there should be 5 players available on the bench for each club to manage as they see fit. The extra player allows cover for injuries or for tactical purposes.
I know Bevo has stated it would be difficult managing 5 players so he may be more likely to carry a tall which would alleviate the need to have a ruckman that can also play other positions. If that's the case, does the need for Lobb diminish?
Yes, I'm wondering if that will come into our planning.
Before the trade period clubs will need to know the direction of the sub or 5 man IC bench
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
28-09-2022, 03:31 PM
#400
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
Instead of 4 players on the bench and a medical sub the speculation is that there will just be 5 players. No increase of interchanges though from what I understand.
I'm asking the question if that will mean a team like ours could now play 2 ruck man instead of 1 and a chop out option.
With 5 on the bench I don't see why not.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
28-09-2022, 03:32 PM
#401
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
Yes, I'm wondering if that will come into our planning.
Before the trade period clubs will need to know the direction of the sub or 5 man IC bench
I wonder if the extra tall is a Leigh Brown ‘Jack if tall trades’ type to take some ruck minutes, and offer coverage in rotations or injury insurance for a KPD or KPF. Someone like a late 2021 version of Schache.
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023
-
28-09-2022, 03:34 PM
#402
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
bulldogtragic
I wonder if the extra tall is a Leigh Brown ‘Jack if tall trades’ type to take some ruck minutes, and offer coverage in rotations or injury insurance for a KPD or KPF. Someone like a late 2021 version of Schache.
I was thinking of a Sweet as a pure ruckman or a Schache play a bit everywhere type.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
28-09-2022, 03:37 PM
#403
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
I was thinking of a Sweet as a pure ruckman or a Schache play a bit everywhere type.
I'll be amazed if Schache is with us next year.
"It's over. It's all over."
-
28-09-2022, 03:42 PM
#404
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
EasternWest
I'll be amazed if Schache is with us next year.
Same here, Schache type doesn't necessarily mean Schache.
Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"
-
28-09-2022, 03:46 PM
#405
Re: Rory Lobb
Originally Posted by
GVGjr
Instead of 4 players on the bench and a medical sub the speculation is that there will just be 5 players. No increase of interchanges though from what I understand.
I'm asking the question if that will mean a team like ours could now play 2 ruck man instead of 1 and a chop out option.
I know what you are saying, but why can't we do the same now with 4 players?
At the end of the day, English needs to rest and someone is needed to replace him during that time. What am I missing?
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.